Kinga Szymaniak

490 total citations
18 papers, 293 citations indexed

About

Kinga Szymaniak is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Kinga Szymaniak has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 293 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Social Psychology, 8 papers in Clinical Psychology and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Kinga Szymaniak's work include Personality Traits and Psychology (8 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). Kinga Szymaniak is often cited by papers focused on Personality Traits and Psychology (8 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). Kinga Szymaniak collaborates with scholars based in Poland, Australia and United States. Kinga Szymaniak's co-authors include Marcin Zajenkowski, Konrad S. Jankowski, Maciej Stolarski, Oliwia Maciantowicz, Anna Z. Czarna, Eddie Harmon‐Jones, Michael Dufner, Pawel L. Urban, Peter K. Jonason and Maria Leniarska and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Kinga Szymaniak

17 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kinga Szymaniak Poland 8 188 149 131 57 50 18 293
Oliwia Maciantowicz Poland 9 208 1.1× 145 1.0× 170 1.3× 90 1.6× 73 1.5× 20 347
Houchao Lyu China 9 154 0.8× 142 1.0× 73 0.6× 50 0.9× 96 1.9× 24 277
Leslie G. Eaton United States 5 146 0.8× 109 0.7× 166 1.3× 83 1.5× 62 1.2× 9 341
Deanna C. Whelan Canada 4 147 0.8× 89 0.6× 97 0.7× 63 1.1× 89 1.8× 5 264
Virginia Thomas United States 8 122 0.6× 77 0.5× 64 0.5× 88 1.5× 59 1.2× 15 247
Joanna Rajchert Poland 10 142 0.8× 51 0.3× 108 0.8× 72 1.3× 43 0.9× 38 260
María Guadalupe C. Salanga Philippines 10 151 0.8× 59 0.4× 72 0.5× 69 1.2× 40 0.8× 20 240
Kateřina Lukavská Czechia 8 75 0.4× 103 0.7× 78 0.6× 196 3.4× 59 1.2× 21 317
Michelle R. Persich United States 11 135 0.7× 78 0.5× 87 0.7× 38 0.7× 33 0.7× 30 253
Gregory R. Gunn Canada 5 172 0.9× 81 0.5× 80 0.6× 147 2.6× 35 0.7× 5 320

Countries citing papers authored by Kinga Szymaniak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kinga Szymaniak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kinga Szymaniak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kinga Szymaniak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kinga Szymaniak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kinga Szymaniak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kinga Szymaniak. The network helps show where Kinga Szymaniak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kinga Szymaniak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kinga Szymaniak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kinga Szymaniak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kinga Szymaniak. Kinga Szymaniak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Malhi, Gin S., et al.. (2025). Subversion of publishing comes to a boil: is it time to lance it?. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 227(2). 517–518.
2.
Harmon‐Jones, Eddie, et al.. (2024). Evil perceptions but not entertainment value appraisals relate to conspiracy beliefs. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 2 indexed citations
3.
Vishkin, Allon, Min Young Kim, Nevin Solak, et al.. (2024). Cultural variation in the motivational correlates of gratitude.. Emotion. 25(1). 114–125. 1 indexed citations
4.
Harmon‐Jones, Eddie, et al.. (2024). Humility and anger. Personality and Individual Differences. 236. 112980–112980. 1 indexed citations
5.
Harmon‐Jones, Eddie, et al.. (2024). Belief in conspiracy theories that differ in evil intentions: Correlations with anger and other traits. Personality and Individual Differences. 224. 112639–112639. 1 indexed citations
6.
Szymaniak, Kinga, et al.. (2023). Further examinations of attitudes toward discrete emotions, with a focus on attitudes toward anger. Motivation and Emotion. 47(3). 476–493. 7 indexed citations
7.
Szymaniak, Kinga, et al.. (2023). Trait anger and approach motivation are related to higher endorsement of specific and generic conspiracy beliefs. Journal of Research in Personality. 104. 104374–104374. 7 indexed citations
8.
Harmon‐Jones, Eddie & Kinga Szymaniak. (2023). Evil perceptions mediate the association between trait anger and generic conspiracy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences. 213. 112303–112303. 7 indexed citations
9.
Szymaniak, Kinga, et al.. (2022). Measuring avoidance-related trait anger: American and Polish versions of the Avoidance Motivated Response to Anger Scale (AMRAS).. Motivation Science. 8(4). 298–315. 2 indexed citations
10.
Jonason, Peter K., Marcin Zajenkowski, Kinga Szymaniak, & Maria Leniarska. (2021). Attitudes towards Poland's ban on abortion: Religiousness, morality, and situational affordances. Personality and Individual Differences. 184. 111229–111229. 7 indexed citations
11.
Szymaniak, Kinga, et al.. (2021). Exploring the Links Between Trait Anger, Self-Reported Sarcasm Use, and Narcissism. Advances in Cognitive Psychology. 17(4). 261–273. 8 indexed citations
12.
Szymaniak, Kinga & Marcin Zajenkowski. (2020). How do high trait anger people feel about rewards high and low in arousal? Disentangling the association between trait anger and subjective pleasantness of rewards. Personality and Individual Differences. 168. 110278–110278. 9 indexed citations
13.
Stolarski, Maciej, Marcin Zajenkowski, Konrad S. Jankowski, & Kinga Szymaniak. (2019). Deviation from the balanced time perspective: A systematic review of empirical relationships with psychological variables. Personality and Individual Differences. 156. 109772–109772. 100 indexed citations
14.
Czarna, Anna Z., Marcin Zajenkowski, Oliwia Maciantowicz, & Kinga Szymaniak. (2019). The relationship of narcissism with tendency to react with anger and hostility: The roles of neuroticism and emotion regulation ability. Current Psychology. 40(11). 5499–5514. 27 indexed citations
15.
Szymaniak, Kinga, et al.. (2019). Trait anger and sarcasm use. Personality and Individual Differences. 154. 109662–109662. 8 indexed citations
16.
Zajenkowski, Marcin, Anna Z. Czarna, Kinga Szymaniak, & Michael Dufner. (2019). What do highly narcissistic people think and feel about (their) intelligence?. Journal of Personality. 88(4). 703–718. 37 indexed citations
17.
Zajenkowski, Marcin & Kinga Szymaniak. (2019). Narcissism between facets and domains. The relationships between two types of narcissism and aspects of the Big Five. Current Psychology. 40(5). 2112–2121. 40 indexed citations
18.
Zajenkowski, Marcin, Oliwia Maciantowicz, Kinga Szymaniak, & Pawel L. Urban. (2018). Vulnerable and Grandiose Narcissism Are Differentially Associated With Ability and Trait Emotional Intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 1606–1606. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Oliwia Maciantowicz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Houchao Lyu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leslie G. Eaton Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Deanna C. Whelan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Virginia Thomas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joanna Rajchert Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by María Guadalupe C. Salanga Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kateřina Lukavská Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michelle R. Persich Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gregory R. Gunn
Rankless by CCL
2026