Kim Reeves

1.4k total citations
19 papers, 969 citations indexed

About

Kim Reeves is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kim Reeves has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 969 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Health, 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kim Reeves's work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (10 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers). Kim Reeves is often cited by papers focused on Intimate Partner and Family Violence (10 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers). Kim Reeves collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Kim Reeves's co-authors include Sarah L. Desmarais, Tonia L. Nicholls, Martin S. Fiebert, Robin P. Telford, Kevin S. Douglas, Laura S. Guy, Allen S. Keller, Barry Rosenfeld, Andrew Rasmussen and Jorge Óscar Folino and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

In The Last Decade

Kim Reeves

19 papers receiving 904 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kim Reeves Canada 12 612 548 535 221 124 19 969
Mary M. Cavanaugh United States 8 328 0.5× 348 0.6× 500 0.9× 192 0.9× 170 1.4× 9 712
Janel M. Leone United States 11 404 0.7× 589 1.1× 947 1.8× 382 1.7× 264 2.1× 15 1.1k
Concepción Blasco‐Ros Spain 8 497 0.8× 295 0.5× 698 1.3× 190 0.9× 216 1.7× 14 828
Marisa L. Beeble United States 12 343 0.6× 253 0.5× 480 0.9× 108 0.5× 214 1.7× 18 651
Denise A. Hines United States 17 424 0.7× 546 1.0× 765 1.4× 490 2.2× 226 1.8× 35 1.1k
Günnur Karakurt United States 15 381 0.6× 300 0.5× 592 1.1× 180 0.8× 234 1.9× 42 843
Mary Ellen Fromuth United States 15 717 1.2× 215 0.4× 362 0.7× 317 1.4× 187 1.5× 20 924
Angela Frederick Amar United States 15 274 0.4× 395 0.7× 421 0.8× 359 1.6× 118 1.0× 43 761
Jodie Valpied Australia 15 280 0.5× 229 0.4× 560 1.0× 164 0.7× 259 2.1× 22 735
Arthur L. Cantos United States 13 416 0.7× 306 0.6× 535 1.0× 187 0.8× 128 1.0× 29 710

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Reeves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Reeves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Reeves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Reeves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Reeves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Reeves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Reeves. The network helps show where Kim Reeves may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Reeves

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Reeves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Reeves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Reeves. Kim Reeves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Reeves, Kim & Carsten Maple. (2019). Realising the vision of digital twins: Challenges in trustworthiness. 39 (7 pp.)–39 (7 pp.). 4 indexed citations
2.
Rettenberger, Martin, Reinhard Eher, Sarah L. Desmarais, et al.. (2017). Kriminalprognosen in der Praxis: die Ergebnisse des International Risk Surveys (IRiS) aus Deutschland. Research Publications (Maastricht University). 63(1). 2–14. 3 indexed citations
3.
Eher, Reinhard, Sarah L. Desmarais, Cristina Hurducas, et al.. (2016). Kriminalprognosen in der Praxis. Diagnostica. 63(1). 2–14. 9 indexed citations
4.
Nielsen, Louise Hjort, Sarah van Mastrigt, Randy K. Otto, et al.. (2015). Violence Risk Assessment Practices in Denmark: A Multidisciplinary National Survey. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 21(2). 103–110. 5 indexed citations
5.
Reeves, Kim, et al.. (2014). Comparing nurses' and doctors' prescribing habits.. PubMed. 110(29). 12–4. 7 indexed citations
6.
Singh, Jay P., Sarah L. Desmarais, Cristina Hurducas, et al.. (2014). International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 13(3). 193–206. 159 indexed citations
7.
Nicholls, Tonia L., et al.. (2013). Risk Assessment in Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Approaches. Partner Abuse. 4(1). 76–168. 80 indexed citations
8.
Nicholls, Tonia L., et al.. (2013). #15 Risk Assessment in Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Approaches. Partner Abuse. 4(1). 1–86. 2 indexed citations
9.
Desmarais, Sarah L., Kim Reeves, Tonia L. Nicholls, Robin P. Telford, & Martin S. Fiebert. (2012). #1 Prevalence of Physical Violence in Intimate Relationships: Part 1. Rates of Male and Female Victimization. Partner Abuse. 3(2). 1–6. 18 indexed citations
10.
Desmarais, Sarah L., Kim Reeves, Tonia L. Nicholls, Robin P. Telford, & Martin S. Fiebert. (2012). Prevalence of Physical Violence in Intimate Relationships, Part 2: Rates of Male and Female Perpetration. Partner Abuse. 3(2). 170–198. 198 indexed citations
11.
Desmarais, Sarah L., Kim Reeves, Tonia L. Nicholls, Robin P. Telford, & Martin S. Fiebert. (2012). Prevalence of Physical Violence in Intimate Relationships, Part 1: Rates of Male and Female Victimization. Partner Abuse. 3(2). 140–169. 155 indexed citations
12.
Desmarais, Sarah L., Kim Reeves, Tonia L. Nicholls, Robin P. Telford, & Martin S. Fiebert. (2012). #2 Prevalence of Physical Violence in Intimate Relationships: Part 2. Rates of Male and Female Perpetration. Partner Abuse. 3(2). 1–10. 7 indexed citations
13.
Storey, Jennifer E., et al.. (2011). Evaluation of a Violence Risk (Threat) Assessment Training Program for Police and Other Criminal Justice Professionals. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 38(6). 554–564. 30 indexed citations
14.
15.
Rasmussen, Andrew, Barry Rosenfeld, Kim Reeves, & Allen S. Keller. (2007). The Subjective Experience of Trauma and Subsequent PTSD in a Sample of Undocumented Immigrants. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 195(2). 137–143. 36 indexed citations
16.
Rasmussen, Andrew, Barry Rosenfeld, Kim Reeves, & Allen S. Keller. (2007). The effects of torture-related injuries on long-term psychological distress in a Punjabi Sikh sample.. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 116(4). 734–740. 23 indexed citations
17.
Desmarais, Sarah L. & Kim Reeves. (2007). Gray, black, and blue: the state of research and intervention for intimate partner abuse among elders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 25(3). 377–391. 26 indexed citations
18.
Reeves, Kim, Sarah L. Desmarais, Tonia L. Nicholls, & Kevin S. Douglas. (2007). Intimate Partner Abuse of Older Men: Considerations for the Assessment of Risk. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect. 19(1-2). 7–27. 17 indexed citations
19.
Douglas, Kevin S., et al.. (2005). HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme: Overview and Annotated Bibliography. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association). 144 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mary M. Cavanaugh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Janel M. Leone Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Concepción Blasco‐Ros Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marisa L. Beeble Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Denise A. Hines Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Günnur Karakurt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mary Ellen Fromuth Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Angela Frederick Amar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jodie Valpied Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Arthur L. Cantos
Rankless by CCL
2026