Kha L. Tu

746 total citations
11 papers, 637 citations indexed

About

Kha L. Tu is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Biomedical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Kha L. Tu has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 637 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Water Science and Technology, 10 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 3 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Kha L. Tu's work include Membrane Separation Technologies (11 papers), Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques (10 papers) and Water Treatment and Disinfection (2 papers). Kha L. Tu is often cited by papers focused on Membrane Separation Technologies (11 papers), Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques (10 papers) and Water Treatment and Disinfection (2 papers). Kha L. Tu collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Jordan and Germany. Kha L. Tu's co-authors include Long D. Nghiem, Allan R. Chivas, Jörg E. Drewes, George P. Simon, Stuart J. Khan, Huanting Wang, Annalie Roux, Takahiro Fujioka, Yvan Poussade and Ibrahim Hotan Alsohaimi and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Chemical Engineering Journal and Journal of Membrane Science.

In The Last Decade

Kha L. Tu

11 papers receiving 619 citations

Peers

Kha L. Tu

WST

BE

ME

EEE

IME

Arnout D’Haese Belgium

Rémi E. Lebrun Canada

Andrzej Benedykt Koltuniewicz Poland

D. Topacik Türkiye

Mehmet Dilaver Türkiye

Noor Sabrina Ahmad Mutamim Malaysia

Shazia Ilyas Pakistan

Samuel Bunani Türkiye

K. Parameshwaran Australia

Amine Mnif Tunisia

Arnout D’Haese Belgium

Kha L. Tu

561 ×1.1

WST

479 ×1.2

BE

137 ×0.9

ME

191 ×1.4

EEE

72 ×0.8

IME

Citations per year, relative to Kha L. Tu Kha L. Tu (= 1×) peers Arnout D’Haese

Countries citing papers authored by Kha L. Tu

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kha L. Tu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kha L. Tu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kha L. Tu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kha L. Tu

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kha L. Tu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kha L. Tu. The network helps show where Kha L. Tu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kha L. Tu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kha L. Tu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kha L. Tu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kha L. Tu. Kha L. Tu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Alshahrani, Ahmed A., Mohammad Saad Algamdi, Ibrahim Hotan Alsohaimi, et al.. (2019). The rejection of mono- and di-valent ions from aquatic environment by MWNT/chitosan buckypaper composite membranes: Influences of chitosan concentrations. Separation and Purification Technology. 234. 116088–116088. 23 indexed citations

2.

Tu, Kha L., George P. Simon, & Huanting Wang. (2017). Fast-responsive monolithic hydrogels as draw agent for forward osmosis membrane process. Separation Science and Technology. 52(16). 2583–2590. 18 indexed citations

3.

Tu, Kha L., Allan R. Chivas, & Long D. Nghiem. (2015). Chemical cleaning effects on properties and separation efficiency of an RO membrane. Membrane Water Treatment. 6(2). 141–160. 17 indexed citations

4.

Tu, Kha L.. (2014). Boron Removal by Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Membranes. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 1 indexed citations

5.

Tu, Kha L., Allan R. Chivas, & Long D. Nghiem. (2014). Effects of chemical preservation on flux and solute rejection by reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science. 472. 202–209. 23 indexed citations

6.

Fujioka, Takahiro, Kha L. Tu, Stuart J. Khan, et al.. (2014). Rejection of small solutes by reverse osmosis membranes for water reuse applications: A pilot-scale study. Desalination. 350. 28–34. 23 indexed citations

7.

Tu, Kha L., Takahiro Fujioka, Stuart J. Khan, et al.. (2013). Boron as a Surrogate for N-Nitrosodimethylamine Rejection by Reverse Osmosis Membranes in Potable Water Reuse Applications. Environmental Science & Technology. 47(12). 6425–6430. 21 indexed citations

8.

Tu, Kha L., Allan R. Chivas, & Long D. Nghiem. (2012). Enhanced boron rejection by NF/RO membranes by complexation with polyols: Measurement and mechanisms. Desalination. 310. 115–121. 25 indexed citations

9.

Tu, Kha L., Allan R. Chivas, & Long D. Nghiem. (2011). Effects of membrane fouling and scaling on boron rejection by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination. 279(1-3). 269–277. 102 indexed citations

10.

Tu, Kha L., Long D. Nghiem, & Allan R. Chivas. (2011). Coupling effects of feed solution pH and ionic strength on the rejection of boron by NF/RO membranes. Chemical Engineering Journal. 168(2). 700–706. 131 indexed citations

11.

Tu, Kha L., Long D. Nghiem, & Allan R. Chivas. (2010). Boron removal by reverse osmosis membranes in seawater desalination applications. Separation and Purification Technology. 75(2). 87–101. 253 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact