Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics
2016477 citationsSzabolcs Borsányi, Zoltán Fodor et al.Natureprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of K.‐H. Kampert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.‐H. Kampert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.‐H. Kampert more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.‐H. Kampert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.‐H. Kampert. The network helps show where K.‐H. Kampert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K.‐H. Kampert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K.‐H. Kampert.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K.‐H. Kampert based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with K.‐H. Kampert. K.‐H. Kampert is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Becker, Martin, Marc Beyer, M. Dürr, et al.. (2023). Qualification of DIRICH readout chain. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1056. 168570–168570.
Argüello, Francisco, et al.. (2019). LIGO/Virgo S190814bv: No neutrino candidates at Pierre Auger Observatory. GRB Coordinates Network. 25409. 1.
8.
Argüello, Francisco, et al.. (2019). LIGO/Virgo S190425z: Pierre Auger Observatory follow-up.. GRB Coordinates Network. 24240. 1.
9.
Borsányi, Szabolcs, Zoltán Fodor, Jana N. Guenther, et al.. (2016). Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics. Nature. 539(7627). 69–71.477 indexed citations breakdown →
Kampert, K.‐H.. (2013). International symposium on future directions in UHECR Physics : UHECR 2012 : Cern, 13-16 February 2012.1 indexed citations
14.
Desiati, P., M. Gurtner, K.‐H. Kampert, et al.. (2013). Study of the Time-dependence of the Cosmic-ray Anisotropy with AMANDA and IceCube. ICRC. 33. 510.2 indexed citations
Kampert, K.‐H.. (2006). Cosmic Rays from the Knee to the Ankle – Status and Prospects.3 indexed citations
17.
Horneffer, A., H. Falcke, & K.‐H. Kampert. (2003). LOPES - Detecting Radio Emission from Cosmic Ray Air Showers. CERN Bulletin. 324(2). 52.2 indexed citations
18.
Bethge, Christian, et al.. (2003). The slow control system of the Auger fluorescence detectors. ICRC. 2. 895.1 indexed citations
19.
Kampert, K.‐H., T. Antoni, W.D. Apel, et al.. (2001). The Physics of the Knee in the Cosmic Ray Spectrum. CERN Bulletin. 27. 240.
20.
Gemmeke, H., et al.. (1997). Concept of an Integrated Trigger System for the Pierre Auger Fluorescence Detector. ICRC. 5. 297.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.