Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows
20041.0k citationsTom Oinn, Matthew Addis et al.Bioinformaticsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin Glover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin Glover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin Glover more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin Glover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin Glover. The network helps show where Kevin Glover may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kevin Glover
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kevin Glover.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kevin Glover based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kevin Glover. Kevin Glover is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Crabtree, Andy, Alan Chamberlain, Michael Davies, et al.. (2013). Doing innovation in the wild. Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham). 1–9.22 indexed citations
12.
Schnädelbach, Holger, et al.. (2012). ExoBuilding. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 19(4). 1–22.50 indexed citations
13.
Chamberlain, Alan, Andy Crabtree, Mark Davies, et al.. (2012). Fresh and local. 1–4.9 indexed citations
Koleva, Boriana, Stefan Rennick‐Egglestone, Holger Schnädelbach, et al.. (2009). Supporting the creation of hybrid museum experiences. Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham). 1973–1982.21 indexed citations
18.
Wolstencroft, Katherine, Tom Oinn, Carole Goble, et al.. (2006). Panoply of Utilities in Taverna. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 3. 156–162.14 indexed citations
19.
Oinn, Tom, Matthew Addis, Justin Ferris, et al.. (2004). Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows. Bioinformatics. 20(17). 3045–3054.1013 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Stevens, Robert, et al.. (2003). Performing in silico experiments on the Grid: a users perspective..11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.