Kenneth E. Schwartz

528 total citations
9 papers, 240 citations indexed

About

Kenneth E. Schwartz is a scholar working on Surgery, Pharmacology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. According to data from OpenAlex, Kenneth E. Schwartz has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 240 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Surgery, 3 papers in Pharmacology and 3 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Recurrent topics in Kenneth E. Schwartz's work include Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers), Adrenal Hormones and Disorders (2 papers) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (2 papers). Kenneth E. Schwartz is often cited by papers focused on Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers), Adrenal Hormones and Disorders (2 papers) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (2 papers). Kenneth E. Schwartz collaborates with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Kenneth E. Schwartz's co-authors include Ada R. Wolfsen, William D. Odell, Michael Schiff, Kenneth J. Gorelick, Joan T. Merrill, Vibeke Strand, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Robert G. Lahita, Michelle Petri and Ellen M. Ginzler and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Endocrinology and Inorganic Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Kenneth E. Schwartz

9 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Kenneth E. Schwartz United States	7	96	66	51	41	34	9	240
O. Dahlbäck Sweden	9	45 0.5×	31 0.5×	16 0.3×	60 1.5×	35 1.0×	30	335
Anna Kotulska Poland	9	41 0.4×	82 1.2×	29 0.6×	72 1.8×	21 0.6×	36	284
G Perpignano Italy	9	66 0.7×	11 0.2×	22 0.4×	34 0.8×	22 0.6×	34	269
K. H. Usadel Germany	9	9 0.1×	208 3.2×	31 0.6×	63 1.5×	16 0.5×	22	382
M. A. Santos Portugal	9	13 0.1×	214 3.2×	10 0.2×	34 0.8×	25 0.7×	12	352
Thomas Koroscil United States	10	19 0.2×	94 1.4×	5 0.1×	82 2.0×	18 0.5×	15	301
Peter Rieser United States	8	105 1.1×	24 0.4×	9 0.2×	64 1.6×	21 0.6×	20	330
I. Hansen Denmark	4	34 0.4×	134 2.0×	16 0.3×	115 2.8×	19 0.6×	5	298
T Matsuo Japan	11	53 0.6×	17 0.3×	37 0.7×	101 2.5×	4 0.1×	22	353
Muriel Del Pino France	5	14 0.1×	46 0.7×	56 1.1×	163 4.0×	23 0.7×	8	317

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth E. Schwartz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth E. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth E. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth E. Schwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth E. Schwartz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth E. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth E. Schwartz. The network helps show where Kenneth E. Schwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth E. Schwartz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth E. Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth E. Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth E. Schwartz. Kenneth E. Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Petri, Michelle, Robert G. Lahita, Ronald van Vollenhoven, et al.. (2002). Effects of prasterone on corticosteroid requirements of women with systemic lupus erythematosus: A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 46(7). 1820–1829. 111 indexed citations

Schwartz, Kenneth E.. (2002). Autoimmunity, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and stress. Journal of Adolescent Health. 30(4). 37–43. 16 indexed citations

Blum, Robert A., et al.. (2001). Effects of Oral Prasterone (Dehydroepiandrosterone) on Single‐Dose Pharmacokinetics of Oral Prednisone and Cortisol Suppression in Normal Women. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 41(11). 1195–1205. 20 indexed citations

Goldblum, Ronald, et al.. (1995). In vivo and in vitro evaluation of four different aqueous polymeric dispersions for producing an enteric coated tablet. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 115(1). 29–34. 8 indexed citations

Schubert, Timothy T., et al.. (1989). A US multicenter study of enprostil 35 ?g twice daily for treatment of prepyloric, pyloric channel, and duodenal bulb ulcers. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 34(9). 1355–1360. 1 indexed citations

Schwartz, Kenneth E., et al.. (1988). Reduction of serum lipoproteins in man by the oral administration of a prostaglandin analogue (enprostil). Atherosclerosis. 71(1). 9–16. 7 indexed citations

Schwartz, Kenneth E., Ronald C. Orlowski, & Robert Marcus. (1981). des-Ser²Salmon Calcitonin: A Biologically Potent Synthetic Analog*. Endocrinology. 108(3). 831–835. 23 indexed citations

Schwartz, Kenneth E., et al.. (1979). Calcitonin in Nonthyroidal Cancer*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 49(3). 438–444. 50 indexed citations

Sudmeier, James L., Kenneth E. Schwartz, & Alan J. Senzel. (1969). Protonation of carbonyl groups in aminocarboxylate coordination compounds. Inorganic Chemistry. 8(12). 2815–2817. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact