Kenneth Clatterbaugh

766 total citations
14 papers, 231 citations indexed

About

Kenneth Clatterbaugh is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Kenneth Clatterbaugh has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 231 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 3 papers in Gender Studies and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Kenneth Clatterbaugh's work include Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (3 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers). Kenneth Clatterbaugh is often cited by papers focused on Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (3 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers). Kenneth Clatterbaugh collaborates with scholars based in United States. Kenneth Clatterbaugh's co-authors include Mark E. Kann, Michael S. Kimmel, Sam Keen, Christine DiStefano, Clyde Griffen, K. Thompson, Victor Jeleniewski Seidler, Robert Bly, Robert J. Moore and Ted Ownby and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The Philosophical Review and Signs.

In The Last Decade

Kenneth Clatterbaugh

13 papers receiving 175 citations

Peers

Kenneth Clatterbaugh

GS

SPS

HPS

PHILO

ECP

Christopher E. Forth United States

Sabina Lovibond United Kingdom

Todd W. Reeser United States

Peter Cryle Australia

Joan M. Ferrante United States

Lilian R. Fürst United States

Barbara Walker United States

Martin Kreiswirth Canada

Jackie Orr United States

Margaret R. Miles United States

Christopher E. Forth United States

Kenneth Clatterbaugh

45 ×0.4

GS

78 ×1.0

SPS

22 ×0.4

HPS

11 ×0.2

PHILO

24 ×1.1

ECP

Citations per year, relative to Kenneth Clatterbaugh Kenneth Clatterbaugh (= 1×) peers Christopher E. Forth

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Clatterbaugh

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Clatterbaugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Clatterbaugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Clatterbaugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth Clatterbaugh

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Clatterbaugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Clatterbaugh. The network helps show where Kenneth Clatterbaugh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth Clatterbaugh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth Clatterbaugh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth Clatterbaugh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth Clatterbaugh. Kenneth Clatterbaugh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. (2018). Contemporary Perspectives on Masculinity. 9 indexed citations

2.

Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. (2014). The Causation Debate in Modern Philosophy, 1637-1739. 3 indexed citations

3.

Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. (2003). Benatar’s Alleged Second Sexism. Social Theory and Practice. 29(2). 211–218. 2 indexed citations

4.

Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. (2000). Literature of the U.S. Men's Movements. Signs. 25(3). 883–894. 18 indexed citations

5.

Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. (1998). What Is Problematic about Masculinities?. Men and Masculinities. 1(1). 24–45. 42 indexed citations

6.

Clatterbaugh, Kenneth, et al.. (1996). Unpacking the Monad. The Monist. 79(3). 408–425. 6 indexed citations

7.

Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. (1996). Contemporary Perspectives On Masculinity: Men, Women, And Politics In Modern Society, Second Edition. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 73 indexed citations

8.

Clatterbaugh, Kenneth, et al.. (1996). Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. 6. 132–140. 34 indexed citations

9.

Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. (1994). “Men and masculinity”: A guide to selected journals, magazines, and newsletters from the men's movements. Serials Review. 20(1). 25–30.

10.

Kimmel, Michael S., Robert Bly, Mark C. Carnes, et al.. (1992). Reading Men: Men, Masculinity, and Publishing. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 21(2). 162–162. 10 indexed citations

11.

Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. (1980). Descartes's Causal Likeness Principle. The Philosophical Review. 89(3). 379–379. 16 indexed citations

12.

Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. (1973). Leibniz's doctrine of individual accidents. Steiner eBooks. 11 indexed citations

13.

Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. (1972). A reply to an attempted refutation of mind-body identity. Philosophical Studies. 23(1-2). 111–112. 1 indexed citations

14.

Clatterbaugh, Kenneth. (1965). General Ontology and the Principle of Acquaintance. Philosophy of Science. 32(3). 272–276. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact