Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Hands Off My Regime! Governments’ Restrictions on Foreign Aid to Non-Governmental Organizations in Poor and Middle-Income Countries
This map shows the geographic impact of Kendra Dupuy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kendra Dupuy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kendra Dupuy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kendra Dupuy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kendra Dupuy. The network helps show where Kendra Dupuy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kendra Dupuy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kendra Dupuy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kendra Dupuy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kendra Dupuy. Kendra Dupuy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dupuy, Kendra, et al.. (2021). Alternatives to Open Burning and Open Detonation: The Disparity Between HMA and Commercial Best Practices. JMU Scholoraly Commons (James Madison University).3 indexed citations
6.
Dupuy, Kendra, et al.. (2020). La psicología cognitiva de la corrupción. Explicaciones del comportamiento no ético a nivel micro.1 indexed citations
7.
Dupuy, Kendra, et al.. (2019). Cursed before production. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).2 indexed citations
8.
Dupuy, Kendra, et al.. (2019). Civil society’s role in petroleum sector governance: The case of Tanzania. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).
9.
Berliner, Daniel & Kendra Dupuy. (2018). The promise and perils of data for anti-corruption efforts in international development work.1 indexed citations
10.
Dupuy, Kendra, et al.. (2018). The cognitive psychology of corruption. Micro-level explanations for unethical behaviour.7 indexed citations
11.
Dupuy, Kendra, et al.. (2018). Corruption and the city: How aid donors can support integrity building in urban spaces.4 indexed citations
Berge, Lars Ivar Oppedal, et al.. (2017). Petroleum populism: How new resource endowments shape voter choices. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).1 indexed citations
14.
Berge, Lars Ivar Oppedal, et al.. (2017). Prospects for peace in a petro-state: Gas extraction and participation in violence in Tanzania. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)). 10.1 indexed citations
15.
Dupuy, Kendra. (2017). The global participation backlash: Implications for natural resource initiatives. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).1 indexed citations
16.
Dupuy, Kendra, et al.. (2016). Petro-Governance in Tanzania: Opportunities and Challenges. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)). 14.3 indexed citations
17.
Dupuy, Kendra, et al.. (2016). At the extremes: Corruption in natural resource management revisited. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).1 indexed citations
18.
Williams, Aled, et al.. (2015). REDD Integrity: An evidence based approach to anti-corruption in REDD+. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).1 indexed citations
19.
Dupuy, Kendra, et al.. (2015). Ebola and corruption: Overcoming critical governance challenges in a crisis situation. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.