459 total citations 9 papers, 268 citations indexed
About
Kelly Latimer is a scholar working on Surgery, Psychiatry and Mental health and Civil and Structural Engineering.
According to data from OpenAlex, Kelly Latimer has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 268 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Surgery, 2 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 1 paper in Civil and Structural Engineering. Recurrent topics in Kelly Latimer's work include Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (2 papers), Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (1 paper) and Elasticity and Material Modeling (1 paper). Kelly Latimer is often cited by papers focused on Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (2 papers), Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (1 paper) and Elasticity and Material Modeling (1 paper). Kelly Latimer collaborates with scholars based in United States and Italy. Kelly Latimer's co-authors include Timothy Mott and has published in prestigious journals such as PubMed and NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
Citations per year, relative to Kelly Latimer Kelly Latimer (= 1×)
peers
F.J. Brenes Bermúdez
Countries citing papers authored by Kelly Latimer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kelly Latimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kelly Latimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kelly Latimer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kelly Latimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kelly Latimer. The network helps show where Kelly Latimer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kelly Latimer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kelly Latimer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kelly Latimer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kelly Latimer. Kelly Latimer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Latimer, Kelly, et al.. (2023). Fatigue in Adults: Evaluation and Management.. PubMed. 108(1). 58–69.5 indexed citations
Mott, Timothy, et al.. (2018). Hemorrhoids: Diagnosis and Treatment Options.. PubMed. 97(3). 172–179.87 indexed citations
5.
Mott, Timothy & Kelly Latimer. (2016). Prevention and Treatment of Drowning.. PubMed. 93(7). 576–82.19 indexed citations
6.
Latimer, Kelly & Timothy Mott. (2015). Lung cancer: diagnosis, treatment principles, and screening.. PubMed. 91(4). 250–6.102 indexed citations
7.
Latimer, Kelly. (2013). Chronic headache: stop the pain before it starts.. PubMed. 62(3). 126–33.3 indexed citations
8.
Latimer, Kelly, et al.. (2012). Evaluation and management of common anorectal conditions.. PubMed. 85(6). 624–30.22 indexed citations
9.
Latimer, Kelly, et al.. (1988). Nonlinearities in spacecraft structural dynamics. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.