Kelli Barbour

741 total citations
15 papers, 426 citations indexed

About

Kelli Barbour is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Kelli Barbour has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 426 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 8 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Kelli Barbour's work include Maternal and fetal healthcare (6 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (5 papers). Kelli Barbour is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and fetal healthcare (6 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (5 papers). Kelli Barbour collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Kelli Barbour's co-authors include Robert M. Silver, Kelsey A. Stewart, Sergio M. Navarro, Chris Lavy, Doris Chou, Lale Say, David M. Haas, Véronique Filippi, Affette McCaw‐Binns and José Guilherme Cecatti and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.

In The Last Decade

Kelli Barbour

14 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kelli Barbour United States 10 246 243 178 39 35 15 426
Lill Trine Nyfløt Norway 11 339 1.4× 402 1.7× 157 0.9× 23 0.6× 31 0.9× 20 520
Sikolia Wanyonyi Kenya 14 505 2.1× 531 2.2× 147 0.8× 38 1.0× 52 1.5× 33 746
S. J. Duthie Hong Kong 12 265 1.1× 377 1.6× 156 0.9× 19 0.5× 31 0.9× 27 551
Adina R. Kern‐Goldberger United States 9 172 0.7× 189 0.8× 95 0.5× 24 0.6× 41 1.2× 41 339
Jeannie C. Kelly United States 12 219 0.9× 177 0.7× 195 1.1× 62 1.6× 12 0.3× 75 452
Pınar Birol Türkiye 11 251 1.0× 73 0.3× 137 0.8× 12 0.3× 11 0.3× 21 362
Duncan J. Etches Canada 5 217 0.9× 214 0.9× 76 0.4× 12 0.3× 47 1.3× 8 327
Elizabeth Lawton United States 10 344 1.4× 353 1.5× 101 0.6× 70 1.8× 29 0.8× 15 641
Emily Johnston United States 6 352 1.4× 354 1.5× 153 0.9× 40 1.0× 82 2.3× 14 642
Lisa Allen Canada 8 107 0.4× 120 0.5× 125 0.7× 10 0.3× 42 1.2× 10 277

Countries citing papers authored by Kelli Barbour

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kelli Barbour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kelli Barbour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kelli Barbour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kelli Barbour

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kelli Barbour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kelli Barbour. The network helps show where Kelli Barbour may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kelli Barbour

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kelli Barbour. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kelli Barbour based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kelli Barbour. Kelli Barbour is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Barbour, Kelli, Sarah Boudová, Chetta Ngamjarus, et al.. (2025). Antenatal medication management for women with sickle‐cell disease: A systematic review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(4).
2.
Barbour, Kelli, et al.. (2023). Congenital fetal neck anomaly—diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma in low-resource setting: case report. AJOG Global Reports. 3(3). 100242–100242. 1 indexed citations
3.
Agrawal, N., et al.. (2022). Impact of the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic on Neonatal Nutrition: Focus on Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Current Tropical Medicine Reports. 9(4). 218–224. 1 indexed citations
4.
Patel, Tulsi, et al.. (2022). The impact of neglected tropical diseases on women and girl refugees: A call for increased awareness and strategic intervention. Frontiers in Tropical Diseases. 3. 1 indexed citations
5.
Stewart, Kelsey A., et al.. (2020). Trends in Ultrasound Use in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 103–120. 78 indexed citations
6.
Cresswell, Jenny A., Kelli Barbour, Doris Chou, et al.. (2020). Measurement of maternal functioning during pregnancy and postpartum: findings from the cross-sectional WHO pilot study in Jamaica, Kenya, and Malawi. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 20(1). 518–518. 10 indexed citations
7.
Guida, José Paulo de Siqueira, Maria Laura Costa, Mary Ângela Parpinelli, et al.. (2018). The impact of hypertension, hemorrhage, and other maternal morbidities on functioning in the postpartum period as assessed by the WHODAS 2.0 36-item tool. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 141. 55–60. 20 indexed citations
8.
Mayrink, Jussara, Renato T. Souza, Carla Silveira, et al.. (2018). Reference ranges of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) score and diagnostic validity of its 12-item version in identifying altered functioning in healthy postpartum women. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 141. 48–54. 16 indexed citations
9.
Barreix, Maria, Kelli Barbour, Affette McCaw‐Binns, et al.. (2018). Standardizing the measurement of maternal morbidity: Pilot study results. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 141. 10–19. 30 indexed citations
10.
Silveira, Carla, Renato T. Souza, Maria Laura Costa, et al.. (2018). Validation of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 12-item tool against the 36-item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and history of severe maternal morbidity. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 141. 39–47. 31 indexed citations
11.
Abernathy, Mary Pell, et al.. (2016). Improved Outcomes for Hispanic Women with Gestational Diabetes Using the Centering Pregnancy© Group Prenatal Care Model. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 21(2). 297–305. 61 indexed citations
12.
Barbour, Kelli, María Barreix, Doris Chou, Affette McCaw‐Binns, & Lale Say. (2016). 874: Developing maternal morbidity identification algorithms: results from the pilot study of the WHO Maternal Morbidity Measurement Tool. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 216(1). S499–S500. 3 indexed citations
13.
Barbour, Kelli, Richard E. Nelson, M. Sean Esplin, Michael W. Varner, & Erin Clark. (2016). 873: A randomized trial of prenatal care using telemedicine for low-risk pregnancies: patient-related cost and time savings. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 216(1). S499–S499. 11 indexed citations
14.
Manuck, Tracy A., Kelli Barbour, Lindsay Janicki, Sean C. Blackwell, & Vincenzo Berghella. (2015). Conversion of Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine abstract presentations to manuscript publications. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 213(3). 405.e1–405.e6. 12 indexed citations
15.
Silver, Robert M. & Kelli Barbour. (2015). Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 42(2). 381–402. 151 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026