Keith M. Cooper

1.2k total citations
32 papers, 969 citations indexed

About

Keith M. Cooper is a scholar working on Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Keith M. Cooper has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 969 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Oceanography, 18 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 15 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Keith M. Cooper's work include Marine Biology and Ecology Research (21 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (12 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (12 papers). Keith M. Cooper is often cited by papers focused on Marine Biology and Ecology Research (21 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (12 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (12 papers). Keith M. Cooper collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Malaysia. Keith M. Cooper's co-authors include H.L. Rees, D.S. Limpenny, S.E. Boyd, Christopher R. S. Barrio Froján, David M. Paterson, Craig J. Brown, Jon Barry, Koen Vanstaen, J.D. Eggleton and Stefan G. Bolam and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Scientific Reports and Environmental Pollution.

In The Last Decade

Keith M. Cooper

31 papers receiving 908 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Keith M. Cooper United Kingdom 19 600 468 463 162 113 32 969
Edward T. Sherwood United States 14 571 1.0× 499 1.1× 314 0.7× 146 0.9× 85 0.8× 27 914
Roberto J. Llansó United States 17 765 1.3× 483 1.0× 641 1.4× 93 0.6× 124 1.1× 26 1.1k
S.E. Boyd United Kingdom 15 558 0.9× 401 0.9× 344 0.7× 113 0.7× 40 0.4× 19 775
Naomi Greenwood United Kingdom 20 795 1.3× 357 0.8× 381 0.8× 68 0.4× 77 0.7× 38 1.1k
Antoine Grémare France 21 934 1.6× 659 1.4× 666 1.4× 119 0.7× 69 0.6× 43 1.3k
Terence A. Palmer United States 18 507 0.8× 461 1.0× 502 1.1× 40 0.2× 96 0.8× 50 956
Micheli Duarte de Paula Costa Australia 14 339 0.6× 744 1.6× 336 0.7× 209 1.3× 77 0.7× 44 995
Yolanda Sagarmínaga Spain 15 418 0.7× 372 0.8× 558 1.2× 73 0.5× 130 1.2× 25 914
Geórgenes H. Cavalcante Brazil 17 398 0.7× 485 1.0× 367 0.8× 109 0.7× 100 0.9× 42 958
Iván F. Rodil Spain 27 1.3k 2.2× 1.1k 2.3× 577 1.2× 138 0.9× 82 0.7× 61 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Keith M. Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith M. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith M. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith M. Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith M. Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith M. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith M. Cooper. The network helps show where Keith M. Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith M. Cooper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith M. Cooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith M. Cooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith M. Cooper. Keith M. Cooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Bolam, Stefan G., Keith M. Cooper, & Anna‐Leena Downie. (2023). Mapping marine benthic biological traits to facilitate future sustainable development. Ecological Applications. 33(7). e2905–e2905. 6 indexed citations
3.
Barry, Jon, et al.. (2021). Statistical comparisons of sediment particle size distributions. Continental Shelf Research. 228. 104548–104548. 1 indexed citations
4.
Thompson, Murray S. A., et al.. (2020). What’s hot and what’s not: Making sense of biodiversity ‘hotspots’. Global Change Biology. 27(3). 521–535. 11 indexed citations
5.
Meng, Xingliang, Juanjuan Chen, Zhengfei Li, et al.. (2020). Degraded functional structure of macroinvertebrates caused by commercial sand dredging practices in a flood plain lake. Environmental Pollution. 263(Pt B). 114415–114415. 13 indexed citations
6.
Meng, Xingliang, Keith M. Cooper, Zhenyuan Liu, et al.. (2020). Integration of α, β and γ components of macroinvertebrate taxonomic and functional diversity to measure of impacts of commercial sand dredging. Environmental Pollution. 269. 116059–116059. 17 indexed citations
7.
Cooper, Keith M. & Jon Barry. (2020). A new machine learning approach to seabed biotope classification. Ocean & Coastal Management. 198. 105361–105361. 4 indexed citations
8.
Meng, Xingliang, Xiaoming Jiang, Zhengfei Li, et al.. (2018). Responses of macroinvertebrates and local environment to short-term commercial sand dredging practices in a flood-plain lake. The Science of The Total Environment. 631-632. 1350–1359. 59 indexed citations
9.
Cooper, Keith M. & Jon Barry. (2017). A big data approach to macrofaunal baseline assessment, monitoring and sustainable exploitation of the seabed. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 12431–12431. 21 indexed citations
10.
Froján, Christopher R. S. Barrio, Keith M. Cooper, & Stefan G. Bolam. (2016). Towards an integrated approach to marine benthic monitoring. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 104(1-2). 20–28. 16 indexed citations
11.
12.
Cooper, Keith M., et al.. (2014). Response of multi-metric indices to anthropogenic pressures in distinct marine habitats: The need for recalibration to allow wider applicability. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 87(1-2). 220–229. 6 indexed citations
13.
Cooper, Keith M.. (2013). Setting limits for acceptable change in sediment particle size composition: Testing a new approach to managing marine aggregate dredging. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 73(1). 86–97. 19 indexed citations
14.
Cooper, Keith M., Daryl Burdon, Jonathan P. Atkins, et al.. (2013). Can the benefits of physical seabed restoration justify the costs? An assessment of a disused aggregate extraction site off the Thames Estuary, UK. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 75(1-2). 33–45. 30 indexed citations
15.
Cooper, Keith M.. (2012). Setting limits for acceptable change in sediment particle size composition following marine aggregate dredging. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 64(8). 1667–1677. 10 indexed citations
16.
Cooper, Keith M., et al.. (2011). Implications of dredging induced changes in sediment particle size composition for the structure and function of marine benthic macrofaunal communities. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 62(10). 2087–2094. 45 indexed citations
17.
Cooper, Keith M., et al.. (2011). Impacts of physical disturbance on the recovery of a macrofaunal community: A comparative analysis using traditional and novel approaches. Ecological Indicators. 12(1). 37–45. 58 indexed citations
18.
Cooper, Keith M., S.E. Boyd, J.D. Eggleton, et al.. (2007). Recovery of the seabed following marine aggregate dredging on the Hastings Shingle Bank off the southeast coast of England. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science. 75(4). 547–558. 48 indexed citations
19.
Brown, Craig J., et al.. (2004). Mapping seabed biotopes using sidescan sonar in regions of heterogeneous substrata: Case study east of the Isle of Wight, English Channel. Underwater Technology The International Journal of the Society for Underwater. 26(1). 27–36. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026