Keith Lowe

2.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
21 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Keith Lowe is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Biotechnology. According to data from OpenAlex, Keith Lowe has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Molecular Biology, 16 papers in Plant Science and 5 papers in Biotechnology. Recurrent topics in Keith Lowe's work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (16 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (6 papers) and Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies (6 papers). Keith Lowe is often cited by papers focused on Plant tissue culture and regeneration (16 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (6 papers) and Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies (6 papers). Keith Lowe collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Keith Lowe's co-authors include Todd J. Jones, George Hoerster, William Gordon‐Kamm, Emily Wu, Ning Wang, Carol A. Rhodes, Bill Gordon‐Kamm, Pamela Dunsmuir, Peter A. Lund and Ajith Anand and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Biotechnology and The Plant Cell.

In The Last Decade

Keith Lowe

19 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Leaf transformation for efficient random integration and ... 2023 2026 2024 2025 2023 25 50 75

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Keith Lowe United States 15 1.1k 975 264 87 44 21 1.3k
Dennis Bidney United States 18 1.3k 1.1× 1.1k 1.2× 243 0.9× 110 1.3× 70 1.6× 23 1.6k
Meizhu Yang United States 13 1.0k 0.9× 970 1.0× 183 0.7× 157 1.8× 12 0.3× 17 1.3k
Saskia Rueb Netherlands 17 756 0.7× 749 0.8× 174 0.7× 42 0.5× 42 1.0× 21 975
Sylvia de Pater Netherlands 19 937 0.8× 847 0.9× 131 0.5× 157 1.8× 21 0.5× 32 1.3k
Diego Albani Italy 18 752 0.7× 963 1.0× 83 0.3× 55 0.6× 32 0.7× 30 1.1k
M. Terzi Italy 16 1.1k 1.0× 1.1k 1.1× 125 0.5× 40 0.5× 43 1.0× 25 1.4k
Zamira Abraham Spain 12 644 0.6× 786 0.8× 115 0.4× 39 0.4× 19 0.4× 12 939
Yannick Bellec France 20 1.1k 0.9× 1.1k 1.1× 76 0.3× 49 0.6× 106 2.4× 27 1.5k
Larry A. Gilbertson United States 16 865 0.8× 568 0.6× 291 1.1× 85 1.0× 33 0.8× 24 1.0k
Nancy A. Reichert United States 11 527 0.5× 516 0.5× 208 0.8× 48 0.6× 33 0.8× 22 740

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Lowe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Lowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Lowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Lowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Lowe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Lowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Lowe. The network helps show where Keith Lowe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith Lowe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith Lowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith Lowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith Lowe. Keith Lowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wang, Ning, Nagesh Sardesai, Emily Wu, et al.. (2023). Leaf transformation for efficient random integration and targeted genome modification in maize and sorghum. Nature Plants. 9(2). 255–270. 90 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Che, Ping, Emily Wu, Marissa K. Simon, et al.. (2022). Wuschel2 enables highly efficient CRISPR/Cas-targeted genome editing during rapid de novo shoot regeneration in sorghum. Communications Biology. 5(1). 71 indexed citations
3.
Hoerster, George, Ning Wang, Emily Wu, et al.. (2020). Use of non-integrating Zm-Wus2 vectors to enhance maize transformation. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant. 56(3). 265–279. 73 indexed citations
4.
Wang, Ning, George Hoerster, Emily Wu, et al.. (2020). An Efficient Gene Excision System in Maize. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11. 18 indexed citations
5.
Adelberg, Jeffrey, et al.. (2019). Use of DoE methodology to optimize the regeneration of high-quality, single-copy transgenic Zea mays L. (maize) plants. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant. 55(6). 678–694. 10 indexed citations
6.
Gordon‐Kamm, Bill, Nagesh Sardesai, Keith Lowe, et al.. (2019). Using Morphogenic Genes to Improve Recovery and Regeneration of Transgenic Plants. Plants. 8(2). 38–38. 124 indexed citations
7.
Ma, Hongxia, Yuanqing Lu, Keith Lowe, et al.. (2019). Regulated hAAT Expression from a Novel rAAV Vector and Its Application in the Prevention of Type 1 Diabetes. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 8(9). 1321–1321. 12 indexed citations
8.
Lowe, Keith, Mauricio La Rota, George Hoerster, et al.. (2018). Rapid genotype “independent” Zea mays L. (maize) transformation via direct somatic embryogenesis. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant. 54(3). 240–252. 232 indexed citations
9.
Jones, Todd J., Keith Lowe, George Hoerster, et al.. (2018). Maize Transformation Using the Morphogenic Genes Baby Boom and Wuschel2. Methods in molecular biology. 1864. 81–93. 40 indexed citations
10.
Lowe, Keith. (2015). L'Europe barbare.
11.
Lowe, Keith, et al.. (2014). Der wilde Kontinent : Europa in den Jahren der Anarchie 1943-1950. Klett-Cotta eBooks. 1 indexed citations
12.
Dante, Ricardo A., Paolo A. Sabelli, Yumin Tao, et al.. (2013). Cyclin-dependent kinase complexes in developing maize endosperm: evidence for differential expression and functional specialization. Planta. 239(2). 493–509. 23 indexed citations
13.
Djukanovic, Vesna, Jeff Smith, Keith Lowe, et al.. (2013). Male‐sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450‐like gene (MS26) using a re‐designed I–CreI homing endonuclease. The Plant Journal. 76(5). 888–899. 98 indexed citations
14.
Gordon‐Kamm, William, Brian P. Dilkes, Keith Lowe, et al.. (2002). Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plant retinoblastoma pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 99(18). 11975–11980. 80 indexed citations
15.
Lowe, Keith, Ben Bowen, George Hoerster, et al.. (1995). Germline Transformation of Maize Following Manipulation of Chimeric Shoot Meristems. Nature Biotechnology. 13(7). 677–682. 48 indexed citations
16.
Lund, Peter A., et al.. (1990). Homologous Recombination in Plant Cells after Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation. The Plant Cell. 2(5). 415–415. 11 indexed citations
17.
Lund, Peter A., et al.. (1990). Homologous recombination in plant cells after Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.. The Plant Cell. 2(5). 415–425. 100 indexed citations
18.
Rhodes, Carol A., et al.. (1988). Plant Regeneration from Protoplasts Isolated from Embryogenic Maize Cell Cultures. Nature Biotechnology. 6(1). 56–60. 125 indexed citations
19.
Lowe, Keith, et al.. (1985). Plant regeneration via organogenesis and embryogenesis in the maize inbred line B73. Plant Science. 41(2). 125–132. 37 indexed citations
20.
Lowe, Keith, et al.. (1969). The Vietnam War as a Richardson Process. Journal of Peace Research. 6(2). 105–111. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026