Citations per year, relative to Keir Reeves Keir Reeves (= 1×)
peers
Victor Konrad
Countries citing papers authored by Keir Reeves
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Keir Reeves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keir Reeves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keir Reeves more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keir Reeves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keir Reeves. The network helps show where Keir Reeves may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keir Reeves
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keir Reeves.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keir Reeves based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Keir Reeves. Keir Reeves is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Reeves, Keir, et al.. (2019). The Great War: Aftermath and Commemoration. FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia). 1–18.3 indexed citations
Lusher, Dean, et al.. (2013). Negative and positive ties: The role of actor attributes. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).1 indexed citations
8.
Frost, Warwick, Jennifer Laing, Keir Reeves, & Fiona Wheeler. (2012). A golden connection: Exploring the challenges of developing interpretation strategies for a Chinese heritage precinct on the central Victorian goldfields. The Historic Environment Policy & Practice. 24(1). 35–40.3 indexed citations
9.
Gorman, Sean & Keir Reeves. (2012). Managing diversity: Reviewing rule 30 and the implications of the racial vilification laws in the Australian football league since 1995. FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia). 15(2). 14–22.2 indexed citations
10.
Reeves, Keir, et al.. (2012). Measuring Harmony, Multiculturalism and Reconciliation: Australian Football League's Racial and Religious Vilification Laws. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 15(2). 51–63.1 indexed citations
Reeves, Keir, Fiona Wheeler, Jennifer Laing, & Warwick Frost. (2011). Chinese mining heritage and tourism in the goldfields of the Pacific Rim. FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia). 23–32.2 indexed citations
Reeves, Keir. (2008). Place, Community and Heritage Tourism in Luang Prabang, Conserving and interpreting the intangible heritage and built environment of an historical cultural landscape. FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia). 311–318.3 indexed citations
16.
Reeves, Keir, et al.. (2007). Court records and cultural landscapes: Rethinking the Chinese gold seekers in central Victoria. Research Bank (Australian Catholic University). 6. 23–38.
Reeves, Keir. (2006). Goldfields Settler or Frontier Rogue? The Trial of James Acoy and the Chinese on the Mount Alexander Diggings. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
20.
Reeves, Keir. (2004). A songster, a sketcher and the Chinese on central Victoria's Mount Alexander diggings: case studies in cultural complexity during the second half of the nineteenth century. [Paper in special issue: Active Voices, Hidden Histories: The Chinese in Colonial Australia.]. 6(2004). 175–191.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.