Katie Pike

2.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
34 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Katie Pike is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Katie Pike has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Surgery, 11 papers in Epidemiology and 7 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Katie Pike's work include Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (10 papers), Blood transfusion and management (6 papers) and Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (6 papers). Katie Pike is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (10 papers), Blood transfusion and management (6 papers) and Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (6 papers). Katie Pike collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Katie Pike's co-authors include Chris Rogers, Gianni D. Angelini, Barnaby C Reeves, Gavin J. Murphy, Sarah Wordsworth, Elizabeth A Stokes, Alison Salt, Peter Brocklehurst, Neil Marlow and Sara Kenyon and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Katie Pike

32 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion after Cardiac Surgery

2015 489 citations Gavin J. Murphy, Katie Pike et al. New England Journal of Medicine profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Katie Pike United Kingdom	14	428	357	355	280	233	34	1.3k
Akshay Shah United Kingdom	19	294 0.7×	238 0.7×	192 0.5×	219 0.8×	97 0.4×	67	1.4k
Júlia Tizue Fukushima Brazil	22	721 1.7×	672 1.9×	377 1.1×	590 2.1×	310 1.3×	52	2.0k
Catherine Tak Piech United States	15	102 0.2×	165 0.5×	268 0.8×	223 0.8×	295 1.3×	60	1.4k
Carlos Morales Colombia	16	321 0.8×	877 2.5×	237 0.7×	605 2.2×	399 1.7×	33	1.8k
France Gauvin Canada	25	888 2.1×	324 0.9×	843 2.4×	727 2.6×	713 3.1×	64	2.8k
Anthony D. Slonim United States	14	69 0.2×	269 0.8×	142 0.4×	246 0.9×	104 0.4×	24	1.1k
Michael R. Bard United States	18	338 0.8×	381 1.1×	183 0.5×	309 1.1×	248 1.1×	32	1.3k
John A. Harvin United States	22	195 0.5×	681 1.9×	154 0.4×	812 2.9×	304 1.3×	73	1.6k
Jordan A. Weinberg United States	22	444 1.0×	866 2.4×	194 0.5×	754 2.7×	297 1.3×	67	2.0k
Marija Vukoja Serbia	18	215 0.5×	87 0.2×	278 0.8×	287 1.0×	431 1.8×	61	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Katie Pike

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katie Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katie Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katie Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katie Pike

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katie Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katie Pike. The network helps show where Katie Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katie Pike

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katie Pike. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katie Pike based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katie Pike. Katie Pike is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Reeves, Barnaby C, Chris Rogers, Katie Pike, et al.. (2024). Adalimumab vs placebo as add-on to Standard Therapy for autoimmune Uveitis: Tolerability, Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness—a protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ASTUTE trial). BMJ Open. 14(1). e082246–e082246.

Dixon, Padraig, et al.. (2021). Cost-effectiveness of rapid laboratory-based mass-spectrometry diagnosis of bloodstream infection: evidence from the RAPIDO randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 11(10). e044623–e044623. 3 indexed citations

MacGowan, Alasdair, Sally Grier, Michael Stoddart, et al.. (2020). Impact of rapid microbial identification on clinical outcomes in bloodstream infection: the RAPIDO randomized trial. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 26(10). 1347–1354. 17 indexed citations

Evans, Rebecca, Katie Pike, Chris Rogers, et al.. (2020). Modifiable healthcare factors affecting 28-day survival in bloodstream infection: a prospective cohort study. BMC Infectious Diseases. 20(1). 545–545. 8 indexed citations

Sarkar, Kunal, Rosie A Harris, Madeleine Clout, et al.. (2019). Preoperative VolumE Replacement therapy in DIabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: results from an open parallel group randomized Controlled Trial (VeRDiCT). Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 30(1). 54–63. 4 indexed citations

Reeves, Barnaby C, Katie Pike, Chris Rogers, et al.. (2016). A multicentre randomised controlled trial of Transfusion Indication Threshold Reduction on transfusion rates, morbidity and health-care resource use following cardiac surgery (TITRe2). Health Technology Assessment. 20(60). 1–260. 28 indexed citations

Stokes, Elizabeth A, Sarah Wordsworth, Danielle Bargo, et al.. (2016). Are lower levels of red blood cell transfusion more cost-effective than liberal levels after cardiac surgery? Findings from the TITRe2 randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 6(8). e011311–e011311. 24 indexed citations

Larcombe, James, et al.. (2015). Implementation of NICE guidance on urinary tract infections in children in primary and secondary care. Acta Paediatrica. 104(6). 630–637. 13 indexed citations

Murphy, Gavin J., Katie Pike, Chris Rogers, et al.. (2015). Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion after Cardiac Surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. 372(11). 997–1008. 489 indexed citations breakdown →

10.

Pike, Katie, et al.. (2015). Transfusion Indication Threshold Reduction (TITRe2) randomized controlled trial in cardiac surgery: statistical analysis plan. Trials. 16(1). 54–54. 2 indexed citations

11.

Johnson, Tom, Andrew Mumford, Katie Pike, et al.. (2014). Point of care platelet activity measurement in primary PCI [PINPOINT-PPCI]: a protocol paper. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 14(1). 44–44. 3 indexed citations

12.

Rogers, Chris, Richard Welbourn, James Byrne, et al.. (2014). The By-Band study: gastric bypass or adjustable gastric band surgery to treat morbid obesity: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot phase. Trials. 15(1). 53–53. 29 indexed citations

13.

Pike, Katie, Sarah Wordsworth, Elizabeth A Stokes, et al.. (2014). A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of Transfusion Indication Threshold Reduction on transfusion rates, morbidity and healthcare resource use following cardiac surgery: Study protocol. Transfusion and Apheresis Science. 50(3). 451–461. 28 indexed citations

14.

Rajakaruna, Chanaka, Chris Rogers, Katie Pike, et al.. (2013). Superior haemodynamic stability during off-pump coronary surgery with thoracic epidural anaesthesia: results from a prospective randomized controlled trial. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 16(5). 602–607. 10 indexed citations

15.

Rogers, Chris, Katie Pike, Gianni D. Angelini, et al.. (2012). An open randomized controlled trial of median sternotomy versus anterolateral left thoracotomy on morbidity and health care resource use in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: The Sternotomy Versus Thoracotomy (STET) trial. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 146(2). 306–316.e9. 56 indexed citations

16.

Caputo, Massimo, Hazaim Alwair, Chris Rogers, et al.. (2011). Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia Improves Early Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Anesthesiology. 114(2). 380–390. 50 indexed citations

17.

Kenyon, Sara, Katie Pike, David R. Jones, et al.. (2010). Has publication of the results of the ORACLE Children Study changed practice in the UK?. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 117(11). 1344–1349. 3 indexed citations

18.

Kenyon, Sara, Katie Pike, DR Jones, et al.. (2008). Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with preterm rupture of the membranes: 7-year follow-up of the ORACLE I trial. The Lancet. 372(9646). 1310–1318. 108 indexed citations

19.

Kenyon, Sara, Katie Pike, DR Jones, et al.. (2008). Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with spontaneous preterm labour: 7-year follow-up of the ORACLE II trial. The Lancet. 372(9646). 1319–1327. 235 indexed citations

20.

Gilbert, Ruth, Katie Pike, Sara Kenyon, William Tarnow‐Mordi, & David J. Taylor. (2005). The effect of prepartum antibiotics on the type of neonatal bacteraemia: insights from the MRC ORACLE trials. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 112(6). 830–832. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact