Kathryn T. Goode
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- David L. RothWilliam E. HaleyGreg R. FordKarlene BallJason E. OwenOlivio J. ClayEdward FaughtDaniel L. Roenker
- Topics
- Older Adults Driving Studies (3 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers)Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationPsychiatry and Mental healthTransportation
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Kathryn T. Goode
13 papers receiving 743 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Psychiatry and Mental health 294
- Clinical Psychology 203
- Sociology and Political Science 198
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 191
- General Health Professions 171
Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn T. Goode
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn T. Goode's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn T. Goode with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn T. Goode more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn T. Goode
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn T. Goode. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn T. Goode. The network helps show where Kathryn T. Goode may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathryn T. Goode
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathryn T. Goode. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathryn T. Goode based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathryn T. Goode. Kathryn T. Goode is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | |
| 2 | 108 | |
| 3 | 45 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 127 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 231 | |
| 8 | 103 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 97 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 30 |
About Kathryn T. Goode
Kathryn T. Goode is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Transportation, having authored 13 papers that have together received 817 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Older Adults Driving Studies (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers) and Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (191 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (294 citations) and Transportation (116 citations). Kathryn T. Goode has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David L. Roth, William E. Haley, Greg R. Ford, Karlene Ball, Jason E. Owen, Olivio J. Clay, Edward Faught, David L. Roth, Daniel L. Roenker and Michael E. Sloane. Their work appears in journals such as Health Psychology, Epilepsia and Psychology and Aging.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.