Kathryn Milburn

642 total citations
10 papers, 429 citations indexed

About

Kathryn Milburn is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Kathryn Milburn has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 429 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Kathryn Milburn's work include Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers) and Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (2 papers). Kathryn Milburn is often cited by papers focused on Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers) and Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (2 papers). Kathryn Milburn collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Kathryn Milburn's co-authors include Jenny Secker, Jonathan Watson, Erica Wimbush, Susan MacAskill, Sarah Cunningham‐Burley, Elizabeth Fraser, Lynn Jamieson, Roona Simpson, Stephen Pavis and Jane Watson and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Epidemiology, Health Education Research and The Sociological Review.

In The Last Decade

Kathryn Milburn

10 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kathryn Milburn United Kingdom 9 217 91 56 50 46 10 429
Fern Walter Goodhart United States 8 238 1.1× 143 1.6× 22 0.4× 75 1.5× 61 1.3× 12 385
Jennifer A. Oliphant United States 11 208 1.0× 46 0.5× 33 0.6× 44 0.9× 63 1.4× 20 380
Mark J. Kittleson United States 9 126 0.6× 73 0.8× 32 0.6× 67 1.3× 71 1.5× 38 317
Sander Matthijs Eggers Netherlands 14 310 1.4× 109 1.2× 39 0.7× 108 2.2× 71 1.5× 24 550
Arnfinn Helleve Norway 13 243 1.1× 109 1.2× 41 0.7× 58 1.2× 52 1.1× 47 475
India D. Rose United States 14 242 1.1× 119 1.3× 25 0.4× 64 1.3× 88 1.9× 30 501
Shirley Damrosch United States 11 164 0.8× 112 1.2× 17 0.3× 35 0.7× 129 2.8× 36 439
Danielle Engel United States 11 318 1.5× 82 0.9× 37 0.7× 100 2.0× 102 2.2× 16 558
Rina Alcalay United States 12 199 0.9× 130 1.4× 22 0.4× 15 0.3× 54 1.2× 24 508
Amelia Knopf United States 11 144 0.7× 122 1.3× 15 0.3× 85 1.7× 82 1.8× 26 354

Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn Milburn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn Milburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn Milburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn Milburn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn Milburn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn Milburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn Milburn. The network helps show where Kathryn Milburn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathryn Milburn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathryn Milburn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathryn Milburn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathryn Milburn. Kathryn Milburn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Navrady, Lauren, Maria Wolters, Donald J. MacIntyre, et al.. (2017). Cohort Profile: Stratifying Resilience and Depression Longitudinally (STRADL): a questionnaire follow-up of Generation Scotland: Scottish Family Health Study (GS:SFHS). International Journal of Epidemiology. 47(1). 13–14g. 27 indexed citations
2.
Jamieson, Lynn, et al.. (2010). Fertility and Social Change: The Neglected Contribution of Men's Approaches to Becoming Partners and Parents. The Sociological Review. 58(3). 463–485. 16 indexed citations
3.
Watson, Jane, Sarah Cunningham‐Burley, Nicholas Watson, & Kathryn Milburn. (1996). Lay theorizing about ‘the body’ and implications for health promotion. Health Education Research. 11(2). 161–172. 17 indexed citations
4.
Milburn, Kathryn. (1996). The importance of lay theorising for health promotion research and practice. Health Promotion International. 11(1). 41–46. 32 indexed citations
5.
Milburn, Kathryn, Elizabeth Fraser, Jenny Secker, & Stephen Pavis. (1995). Combining methods in health promotion research: some considerations about appropriate use. Health Education Journal. 54(3). 347–356. 17 indexed citations
6.
Milburn, Kathryn. (1995). Never mind the quantity, investigate the depth!. British Food Journal. 97(7). 36–38. 18 indexed citations
7.
Milburn, Kathryn. (1995). A critical review of peer education with young people with special reference to sexual health. Health Education Research. 10(4). 407–420. 194 indexed citations
8.
Secker, Jenny, Erica Wimbush, Jonathan Watson, & Kathryn Milburn. (1995). Qualitative methods in health promotion research: some criteria for quality. Health Education Journal. 54(1). 74–87. 86 indexed citations
9.
Milburn, Kathryn, et al.. (1994). Belief systems and social circumstances influencing the health choices of people in Lochaber. Health Education Journal. 53(1). 58–72. 4 indexed citations
10.
Milburn, Kathryn & Susan MacAskill. (1994). Cervical screening: continuing concerns in the 1990s. Health Education Journal. 53(2). 201–213. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026