Kathrin Damm

1.1k total citations
41 papers, 746 citations indexed

About

Kathrin Damm is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Kathrin Damm has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 746 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in General Health Professions, 13 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Kathrin Damm's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (11 papers), Health and Medical Studies (7 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (6 papers). Kathrin Damm is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (11 papers), Health and Medical Studies (7 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (6 papers). Kathrin Damm collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Denmark. Kathrin Damm's co-authors include Katharina Schmidt, J.-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg, Ines Aumann, Jan Zeidler, Lea de Jong, Anne Prenzler, Christian Jacob, Heiko Golpon, Tobias Welte and Arndt Vogel and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ Open, BMC Health Services Research and Contraception.

In The Last Decade

Kathrin Damm

39 papers receiving 707 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kathrin Damm Germany 14 223 135 132 125 111 41 746
Ben B. Hansen United States 12 187 0.8× 165 1.2× 238 1.8× 64 0.5× 85 0.8× 27 1.5k
Marie Ward Ireland 20 325 1.5× 62 0.5× 69 0.5× 73 0.6× 138 1.2× 74 1.2k
Mohammed T Ansari India 12 183 0.8× 70 0.5× 112 0.8× 63 0.5× 221 2.0× 50 1.0k
M. Tavakoli United Kingdom 10 185 0.8× 62 0.5× 204 1.5× 50 0.4× 123 1.1× 24 977
Stefan K. Lhachimi Germany 24 367 1.6× 117 0.9× 212 1.6× 71 0.6× 316 2.8× 70 1.7k
Lisa DiMartino United States 19 220 1.0× 69 0.5× 104 0.8× 100 0.8× 197 1.8× 38 859
Angela T. Chen United States 14 544 2.4× 98 0.7× 343 2.6× 149 1.2× 118 1.1× 36 1.5k
Ming‐Chin Yang Taiwan 22 313 1.4× 43 0.3× 261 2.0× 111 0.9× 123 1.1× 106 1.4k
Lars Schwettmann Germany 16 229 1.0× 52 0.4× 168 1.3× 78 0.6× 88 0.8× 87 995
Harshana Liyanage United Kingdom 16 199 0.9× 38 0.3× 53 0.4× 92 0.7× 188 1.7× 54 925

Countries citing papers authored by Kathrin Damm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathrin Damm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathrin Damm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathrin Damm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathrin Damm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathrin Damm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathrin Damm. The network helps show where Kathrin Damm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathrin Damm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathrin Damm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathrin Damm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathrin Damm. Kathrin Damm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Stiel, Stephanie, et al.. (2024). Consensus-based recommendations for the development and expansion of palliative day care clinics in Germany: results of a Delphi study. BMC Palliative Care. 23(1). 116–116. 1 indexed citations
3.
Stiel, Stephanie, et al.. (2024). Empirisch abgeleitete Empfehlungen für den Auf- und Ausbau von Tageshospizen in Deutschland – Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Befragung mit Expert:innen. Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen. 185. 72–82. 1 indexed citations
4.
Jong, Lea de, et al.. (2023). The impact of different care dependencies on people’s willingness to provide informal care: a discrete choice experiment in Germany. Health Economics Review. 13(1). 35–35. 2 indexed citations
5.
Jong, Lea de, Jan Zeidler, & Kathrin Damm. (2022). A systematic review to identify the use of stated preference research in the field of older adult care. European Journal of Ageing. 19(4). 1005–1056. 6 indexed citations
6.
Jong, Lea de, Jona T. Stahmeyer, Sveja Eberhard, Jan Zeidler, & Kathrin Damm. (2021). Willingness and preparedness to provide care: interviews with individuals of different ages and with different caregiving experiences. BMC Geriatrics. 21(1). 207–207. 11 indexed citations
7.
Jong, Lea de, Jona T. Stahmeyer, Sveja Eberhard, Jan Zeidler, & Kathrin Damm. (2020). „Aber vielfach scheitert man dann an Besonderheiten“ – Pflegeberater über Gesetzesänderungen und die Herausforderungen ihrer Arbeit: Eine qualitative Untersuchung. Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen. 150-152. 65–72. 4 indexed citations
8.
9.
10.
Damm, Kathrin, et al.. (2019). Patient-reported data informing early benefit assessment of rare diseases in Germany: A systematic review. Health Economics Review. 9(1). 34–34. 6 indexed citations
11.
Schmidt, Katharina, et al.. (2019). Needs and preferences of informal caregivers regarding outpatient care for the elderly: a systematic literature review. BMC Geriatrics. 19(1). 82–82. 122 indexed citations
12.
Schmidt, Katharina, et al.. (2018). Which attributes of whole genome sequencing tests are most important to the general population? Results from a German preference study. Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine. Volume 11. 7–21. 5 indexed citations
13.
14.
Schmidt, Katharina, Kathrin Damm, Arndt Vogel, et al.. (2017). Therapy preferences of patients with lung and colon cancer: a discrete choice experiment. Patient Preference and Adherence. Volume 11. 1647–1656. 21 indexed citations
15.
Schmidt, Katharina, et al.. (2016). Comparison of different approaches applied in Analytic Hierarchy Process – an example of information needs of patients with rare diseases. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 16(1). 117–117. 35 indexed citations
16.
Damm, Kathrin, Andreas Horn, Niels Serup‐Hansen, et al.. (2016). Patient preferences in allergy immunotherapy (AIT) in Germany – a discrete-choice-experiment. Health Economics Review. 6(1). 32–32. 16 indexed citations
18.
Damm, Kathrin, et al.. (2014). Does the perception of fairness and standard of care in the health system depend on the field of study? Results of an empirical analysis. BMC Health Services Research. 14(1). 166–166. 1 indexed citations
19.
Damm, Kathrin, Ansgar Lange, Jan Zeidler, Sebastian Braun, & J. - Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg. (2012). Einführung des neuen Tätigkeitsschlüssels und seine Anwendung in GKV-Routinedatenauswertungen. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. 55(2). 238–244. 8 indexed citations
20.
Damm, Kathrin, et al.. (2011). Promoting vaccinations - an analysis of measures taken by German statutory health insurers. Health Economics Review. 1(1). 16–16. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026