Katherine T. Baum

937 total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 706 citations indexed

About

Katherine T. Baum is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Katherine T. Baum has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 706 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Clinical Psychology, 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Katherine T. Baum's work include Family and Disability Support Research (6 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers). Katherine T. Baum is often cited by papers focused on Family and Disability Support Research (6 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers). Katherine T. Baum collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Katherine T. Baum's co-authors include Dean W. Beebe, John K. Field, Anjali Desai, Lauren E. Miller, Joseph R. Rausch, Steven R. Howe, Ton J. deGrauw, Anna W. Byars, John E. Bates and Joan K. Austin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Neuropharmacology and Journal of Neurotrauma.

In The Last Decade

Katherine T. Baum

16 papers receiving 688 citations

Hit Papers

Sleep restriction worsens mood and emotion regulation in ... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Katherine T. Baum United States 11 374 238 187 149 127 17 706
Angela F. Lukowski United States 16 239 0.6× 323 1.4× 190 1.0× 146 1.0× 80 0.6× 45 959
Isabel Morales‐Muñoz United Kingdom 16 241 0.6× 157 0.7× 197 1.1× 119 0.8× 138 1.1× 56 636
Rebecca G. Astill Netherlands 6 539 1.4× 444 1.9× 87 0.5× 86 0.6× 108 0.9× 6 769
Syuichi Ooki Japan 19 292 0.8× 176 0.7× 221 1.2× 354 2.4× 88 0.7× 68 1.0k
Maria Grazia Melegari Italy 14 237 0.6× 185 0.8× 248 1.3× 87 0.6× 269 2.1× 25 605
Anna Joyce United Kingdom 15 139 0.4× 165 0.7× 96 0.5× 128 0.9× 100 0.8× 26 623
Danila Caruso Italy 11 323 0.9× 202 0.8× 182 1.0× 28 0.2× 166 1.3× 18 636
Suzanne M. Houston United States 7 91 0.2× 257 1.1× 155 0.8× 231 1.6× 68 0.5× 7 725
Fabian Guenolé France 14 175 0.5× 321 1.3× 154 0.8× 43 0.3× 129 1.0× 54 580
Beate Oerbeck Norway 22 214 0.6× 452 1.9× 511 2.7× 255 1.7× 489 3.9× 46 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine T. Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine T. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine T. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine T. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine T. Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine T. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine T. Baum. The network helps show where Katherine T. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katherine T. Baum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katherine T. Baum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katherine T. Baum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katherine T. Baum. Katherine T. Baum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Kim, Nayoung, Gülce Askin, Linda M. Gerber, et al.. (2021). Acute Imaging Findings Predict Recovery of Cognitive and Motor Function after Inpatient Rehabilitation for Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pediatric Brain Injury Consortium Study. Journal of Neurotrauma. 38(14). 1961–1968. 7 indexed citations
2.
Baum, Katherine T., Taralee Hamner, Robyn Howarth, et al.. (2020). COVID-19 issues related to pediatric neuropsychology and inpatient rehabilitation – challenges to usual care and solutions during the pandemic. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 34(7-8). 1380–1394. 18 indexed citations
3.
Wade, Shari L., Megan E. Narad, Emily L. Moscato, et al.. (2019). A Survivor's Journey: Preliminary efficacy of an online problem‐solving therapy for survivors of pediatric brain tumor. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 67(2). e28043–e28043. 16 indexed citations
4.
Gerstle, Melissa, et al.. (2019). Evolution of parental knowledge and efficacy across the pediatric neuropsychological evaluation process. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 33(4). 743–759. 13 indexed citations
5.
Baum, Katherine T., et al.. (2018). Process Reliability and Psychological Stress in Urine Sample Collection for Drug Testing: A Pilot Study. Journal of Applied Life Sciences International. 19(1). 1–12.
6.
Raj, Stacey P., et al.. (2017). Development of a Web-Based Psychosocial Intervention for Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of Pediatric Brain Tumor. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology. 7(2). 187–195. 14 indexed citations
7.
Baum, Katherine T., Stephanie Powell, Lisa A. Jacobson, et al.. (2017). Implementing guidelines: Proposed definitions of neuropsychology services in pediatric oncology. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 64(8). 35 indexed citations
8.
Baum, Katherine T., et al.. (2017). Communication is key: the utility of a revised neuropsychological report format. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 32(3). 345–367. 20 indexed citations
9.
Leff, Stephen S., Katherine T. Baum, Katherine B. Bevans, & Nathan J. Blum. (2014). Development, Validation, and Utility of an Instrument to Assess Core Competencies in the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) Program. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 19(2). 314–323. 8 indexed citations
10.
Baum, Katherine T., Paula K. Shear, Steven R. Howe, & Somer Bishop. (2014). A comparison of WISC-IV and SB-5 intelligence scores in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Autism. 19(6). 736–745. 22 indexed citations
11.
Baum, Katherine T., Anjali Desai, John K. Field, et al.. (2013). Sleep restriction worsens mood and emotion regulation in adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 55(2). 180–190. 462 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Baum, Katherine T.. (2012). Measurement of Intelligence in Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Factors Affecting Performance. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network). 1 indexed citations
13.
Baum, Katherine T., Anna W. Byars, Ton J. deGrauw, et al.. (2010). The effect of temperament and neuropsychological functioning on behavior problems in children with new-onset seizures. Epilepsy & Behavior. 17(4). 467–473. 46 indexed citations
15.
Baum, Katherine T., Anna W. Byars, Ton J. deGrauw, et al.. (2007). Temperament, family environment, and behavior problems in children with new-onset seizures. Epilepsy & Behavior. 10(2). 319–327. 18 indexed citations
16.
Bardgett, Mark E., et al.. (2006). Effects of risperidone on locomotor activity and spatial memory in rats with hippocampal damage. Neuropharmacology. 51(7-8). 1156–1162. 20 indexed citations
17.
Bristol, David G., et al.. (1984). Adenocarcinoma of the jejunum in two cows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 185(5). 551–553. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026