Kate Swaffer

1.1k citations
26 papers · 427 indexed · h-index 12

Kate Swaffer

25 papers receiving 417 citations

Peers

Kate Swaffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 21
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 163
  • General Health Professions 271
  • Conservation 15
  • Health 36
Replace Jennifer Bray with:
Jennifer Bray United Kingdom
Ana Diaz‐Ponce United Kingdom
Louise McCabe United Kingdom
Hannah Jelley United Kingdom
Nicolas Kühne Switzerland
Siri Ytrehus Norway
Cathy Lysack United States
Aravind Komuravelli United Kingdom
Emily S. Ihara United States
Raina Croff United States
Kate Swaffer relative to Jennifer Bray United Kingdom Jennifer Bray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Jennifer Bray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Swaffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Swaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Swaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Swaffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Swaffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Swaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Swaffer. The network helps show where Kate Swaffer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Swaffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Swaffer Line = papers co-authored together Kate Swaffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20244
3 20232
4
"Missing Persons": Absent Voices of People with Dementia in the Australian Royal Commission into Aged Care.
20232
5 20227
6
Reparations for Harms Experienced in Residential Aged Care.
20224
7 20222
8 20216
9 202113
10 202117
11 202020
12 202020
13
Human Rights and the Confinement of People Living with Dementia in Care Homes.
202026
14 201925
15 201922
16 201923
17 201942
18 20181
19 201740
20 201673

About Kate Swaffer

Kate Swaffer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (4 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Elder Abuse and Neglect (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (21 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (163 citations) and General Health Professions (271 citations). Kate Swaffer has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lyn Phillipson, Lee‐Fay Low, Henry Brodaty, Margaret McGrath, Chris Brennan‐Horley, Linda Steele, Elizabeth K. Cridland, Richard Fleming, Monica Cations and Kate Laver. Their work appears in journals such as Dementia, Australasian Journal on Ageing, Alzheimer s & Dementia, BMJ Open and Health Expectations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026