Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Bamboo-based composites: A review on fundamentals and processes of bamboo bonding
2022205 citationsJialin Zhang, Kate Semple et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Semple's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Semple with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Semple more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Semple. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Semple. The network helps show where Kate Semple may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Semple
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Semple.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Semple based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Semple. Kate Semple is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Semple, Kate, et al.. (2014). Reinforced-Core Particleboard for Improved Screw-Holding Ability. Wood and Fiber Science. 46(1). 48–64.5 indexed citations
11.
Semple, Kate, et al.. (2008). IMPROVING CORE BOND STRENGTH OF PARTICLEBOARD THROUGH PARTICLE SIZE REDISTRIBUTION. Wood and Fiber Science. 40(2). 214–224.49 indexed citations
12.
Semple, Kate & Philip D. Evans. (2007). Manufacture of Wood-Cement Composites from Acacia Mangium . Part II. Use of Accelerators in the Manufacture of Wood-Wool Cement Boards from A. Mangium. Wood and Fiber Science. 39(1). 120–131.5 indexed citations
13.
Semple, Kate, et al.. (2006). Effect of Extended Mat Open Assembly Time on Properties of OSB Bonded With PMDI. Wood and Fiber Science. 38(3). 546–552.2 indexed citations
14.
Semple, Kate & Gregory D. Smith. (2006). Prediction of Internal Bond Strength in Particleboard from Screw Withdrawal Resistance Models. Wood and Fiber Science. 38(2). 256–267.27 indexed citations
15.
Semple, Kate, et al.. (2006). Transverse Permeability of OSB. Part II. Modeling the Effects of Density and Core Fines Content. Wood and Fiber Science. 38(3). 463–473.9 indexed citations
16.
Semple, Kate, et al.. (2006). Permeability of OSB. Part I. The Effects of Core Fines Content and Mat Density on Transverse Permeability. Wood and Fiber Science. 38(3). 450–462.13 indexed citations
Semple, Kate, Ross B. Cunningham, & Philip D. Evans. (2004). Manufacture of Wood-Cement Composites from Acacia Mangium: Mechanistic Study of Compounds Improving the Compatibility of Acacia Mangium Heartwood with Portland Cement. Wood and Fiber Science. 36(2). 250–259.4 indexed citations
19.
Semple, Kate & Philip D. Evans. (2000). ADVERSE EFFECTS OF HEARTWOOD ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD-WOOL CEMENT BOARDS MANUFACTURED FROM RADIATA PINE WOOD. Wood and Fiber Science. 32(1). 37–43.21 indexed citations
20.
Semple, Kate & Philip D. Evans. (1999). Selected wood characteristics of tropical acacia and eucalypt species growing in provenance trials in north Queensland, Australia. The International Forestry Review.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.