Kate Scott

3.2k total citations
42 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Kate Scott is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Economics and Econometrics and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Scott has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Environmental Engineering, 15 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 14 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment. Recurrent topics in Kate Scott's work include Environmental Impact and Sustainability (20 papers), Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (12 papers) and Climate Change Policy and Economics (12 papers). Kate Scott is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Impact and Sustainability (20 papers), Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (12 papers) and Climate Change Policy and Economics (12 papers). Kate Scott collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Kate Scott's co-authors include John Barrett, Anne Owen, Thomas Wiedmann, Manfred Lenzen, Glen P. Peters, Sangwon Suh, Andy Gouldson, Stephen C. Robinson, Frances R. Balkwill and Katy Roelich and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Environmental Science & Technology and Journal of Cleaner Production.

In The Last Decade

Kate Scott

40 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kate Scott United Kingdom 23 1.4k 851 665 299 281 42 2.5k
João F. D. Rodrigues Netherlands 28 1.3k 0.9× 1.1k 1.2× 570 0.9× 235 0.8× 384 1.4× 59 2.3k
Jan Weinzettel Czechia 21 1.9k 1.3× 899 1.1× 410 0.6× 159 0.5× 266 0.9× 40 2.9k
Xu Tian China 33 1.4k 1.0× 1.1k 1.2× 412 0.6× 143 0.5× 267 1.0× 82 2.8k
Stephan Lutter Austria 25 2.1k 1.4× 1.1k 1.3× 615 0.9× 191 0.6× 469 1.7× 53 3.1k
David Font Vivanco United Kingdom 23 870 0.6× 519 0.6× 734 1.1× 166 0.6× 267 1.0× 37 1.8k
Rui Wu China 30 1.1k 0.7× 1.2k 1.4× 527 0.8× 176 0.6× 256 0.9× 65 2.5k
Xi Ji China 28 1.1k 0.8× 685 0.8× 362 0.5× 149 0.5× 160 0.6× 44 2.0k
Jesper Munksgaard Denmark 16 2.0k 1.4× 1.1k 1.3× 839 1.3× 222 0.7× 280 1.0× 31 2.9k
Andreas Mayer Switzerland 33 1.2k 0.8× 561 0.7× 484 0.7× 274 0.9× 441 1.6× 167 4.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Scott. The network helps show where Kate Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Scott. Kate Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Sharmina, Maria, et al.. (2023). Impact of Circular Economy Measures in the European Union Built Environment on a Net-Zero Target. Circular Economy and Sustainability. 3(4). 1989–2008. 5 indexed citations
3.
Petrova, Saška, et al.. (2023). Making and mobilising place: The governance of Greater Manchester’s decarbonisation ambitions. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography. 77(3). 157–170. 3 indexed citations
4.
Barrett, John, Steve Pye, Oliver Broad, et al.. (2022). Energy demand reduction options for meeting national zero-emission targets in the United Kingdom. Nature Energy. 7(8). 726–735. 118 indexed citations
5.
Petrova, Saška, et al.. (2022). The crises of a crisis: The impact of Covid-19 on localised decarbonisation ambitions in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science. 93. 102838–102838. 4 indexed citations
6.
Scott, Kate, Jannik Giesekam, John Barrett, & Anne Owen. (2018). Bridging the climate mitigation gap with economy‐wide material productivity. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 23(4). 918–931. 38 indexed citations
7.
Spaiser, Viktoria, Kate Scott, Anne Owen, & Robert A. Holland. (2018). Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions in the sustainable development Goals Agenda. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 26(4). 282–289. 56 indexed citations
8.
Cherry, Catherine, Kate Scott, John Barrett, & Nick Pidgeon. (2018). Public acceptance of resource-efficiency strategies to mitigate climate change. Nature Climate Change. 8(11). 1007–1012. 51 indexed citations
9.
Cherry, Catherine, et al.. (2018). By popular demand: what people want from a resource efficient economy. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 4 indexed citations
10.
Millward-Hopkins, Joel, Andy Gouldson, Kate Scott, John Barrett, & Andrew Sudmant. (2017). Uncovering blind spots in urban carbon management: the role of consumption-based carbon accounting in Bristol, UK. Regional Environmental Change. 17(5). 1467–1478. 33 indexed citations
11.
Cooper, Sam, Jannik Giesekam, Geoffrey P. Hammond, et al.. (2017). Thermodynamic insights and assessment of the ‘circular economy’. Journal of Cleaner Production. 162. 1356–1367. 58 indexed citations
12.
Scott, Kate, Hannah Daly, John Barrett, & Neil Strachan. (2016). National climate policy implications of mitigating embodied energy system emissions. Climatic Change. 136(2). 325–338. 19 indexed citations
13.
Daly, Hannah, Kate Scott, Neil Strachan, & John Barrett. (2015). Indirect CO2 Emission Implications of Energy System Pathways: Linking IO and TIMES Models for the UK. Environmental Science & Technology. 49(17). 10701–10709. 88 indexed citations
14.
Scott, Kate & John Barrett. (2015). An integration of net imported emissions into climate change targets. Environmental Science & Policy. 52. 150–157. 46 indexed citations
15.
Wiedmann, Thomas, Sangwon Suh, Kuishuang Feng, et al.. (2011). Application of Hybrid Life Cycle Approaches to Emerging Energy Technologies – The Case of Wind Power in the UK. Environmental Science & Technology. 45(13). 5900–5907. 229 indexed citations
16.
Minx, Jan C., Thomas Wiedmann, Richard Wood, et al.. (2009). INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS. Economic Systems Research. 21(3). 187–216. 384 indexed citations
17.
Scott, Kate, et al.. (2009). A literature review on sustainable lifestyles and recommendations for further research. 20 indexed citations
18.
Dawkins, Elena, John Barrett, Jan C. Minx, & Kate Scott. (2008). Wales’ ecological footprint: Scenarios to 2020. 3 indexed citations
19.
Robinson, Stephen C., Kate Scott, & Frances R. Balkwill. (2002). Chemokine stimulation of monocyte matrix metalloproteinase-9 requires endogenous TNF-α. European Journal of Immunology. 32(2). 404–412. 155 indexed citations
20.
Scott, Kate, Edward J. Wood, & Eric Karran. (1998). A matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor which prevents fibroblast‐mediated collagen lattice contraction. FEBS Letters. 441(1). 137–140. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026