Kate C. Baker

57 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Kate C. Baker
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Developmental Biology 165
  • Small Animals 522
  • Social Psychology 748
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 72
  • Genetics 388
Replace Jonathan Balcombe with:
Jonathan Balcombe United States
Heiko G. Rödel France
Luděk Bartoš Czechia
Trevor B. Poole United Kingdom
Stephen R. Ross United States
Viktor Reinhardt United States
Kristen E. Lukas United States
Cornelia Kraus Germany
Jeroen M. G. Stevens Belgium
Angelo Quaranta Italy
Kate C. Baker relative to Jonathan Balcombe United States Jonathan Balcombe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Jonathan Balcombe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate C. Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate C. Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate C. Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate C. Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate C. Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate C. Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate C. Baker. The network helps show where Kate C. Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate C. Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate C. Baker Line = papers co-authored together Kate C. Baker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997118
2
BENEFITS OF POSITIVE HUMAN INTERACTION FOR SOCIALLY-HOUSED CHIMPANZEES.
200489
3 201966
4 199766
5 201154
6 201053
7 200652
8 200849
9 199649
10 201644
11 200039
12 199636
13 200031
14 202025
15 201624
16 201323
17 200723
18 201722
19
Effects of extended-release injectable naltrexone on self-injurious behavior in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).
201222
20 200320

About Kate C. Baker

Kate C. Baker is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Small Animals, Genetics, Developmental Biology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (35 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (16 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (12 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (165 citations), Small Animals (522 citations), Social Psychology (748 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (72 citations) and Genetics (388 citations). Kate C. Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brunei. Frequent co-authors include Filippo Aureli, Mark Griffiths, Mollie A. Bloomsmith, Margaret H. Gilbert, Markus P. Eichhorn, Valérie A. M. Schoof, Danielle Springer, Lara A. Doyle, Carolyn M. Crockett and James L. Weed. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Primatology, Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, Applied Animal Behaviour Science and Journal of Medical Primatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact