Karen E. Hatley

549 total citations
19 papers, 391 citations indexed

About

Karen E. Hatley is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Karen E. Hatley has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 391 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in General Health Professions, 10 papers in Clinical Psychology and 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Karen E. Hatley's work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (10 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (9 papers). Karen E. Hatley is often cited by papers focused on Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (10 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (9 papers). Karen E. Hatley collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Canada. Karen E. Hatley's co-authors include Deborah F. Tate, Karen Muñoz‐Christian, Suzanne Phelan, Anna Brannen, Andrew Schaffner, Todd Hagobian, Wei Lang, Molly Diamond, Kristen Polzien and Brooke T. Nezami and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Health Psychology and JAMA Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Karen E. Hatley

18 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Karen E. Hatley United States 11 213 157 114 95 83 19 391
Caragh Flannery Ireland 10 189 0.9× 85 0.5× 47 0.4× 137 1.4× 43 0.5× 22 374
Helena Piccinini‐Vallis Canada 9 193 0.9× 112 0.7× 95 0.8× 100 1.1× 49 0.6× 31 461
Maryam Kebbe Canada 11 259 1.2× 128 0.8× 92 0.8× 32 0.3× 56 0.7× 46 433
Karen Muñoz‐Christian United States 10 152 0.7× 88 0.6× 49 0.4× 178 1.9× 32 0.4× 13 297
Lisa Vincze Australia 11 136 0.6× 102 0.6× 26 0.2× 119 1.3× 61 0.7× 30 351
Maria Henström Sweden 9 124 0.6× 110 0.7× 32 0.3× 59 0.6× 58 0.7× 17 283
Susan Wilkinson United States 10 178 0.8× 54 0.3× 55 0.5× 122 1.3× 31 0.4× 23 330
Chelsea McKinney United States 8 204 1.0× 52 0.3× 45 0.4× 176 1.9× 25 0.3× 10 453
Molly Kellogg United States 3 134 0.6× 91 0.6× 50 0.4× 9 0.1× 74 0.9× 5 314
Kathryn Carrier United States 5 378 1.8× 49 0.3× 35 0.3× 364 3.8× 73 0.9× 6 493

Countries citing papers authored by Karen E. Hatley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen E. Hatley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen E. Hatley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen E. Hatley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen E. Hatley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen E. Hatley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen E. Hatley. The network helps show where Karen E. Hatley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen E. Hatley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen E. Hatley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen E. Hatley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen E. Hatley. Karen E. Hatley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
2.
Nezami, Brooke T., et al.. (2025). Optimizing a mobile just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) for weight loss in young adults: Rationale and design of the AGILE factorial randomized trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 150. 107808–107808. 1 indexed citations
3.
Pinto, Ana M., Deborah F. Tate, Gary D. Foster, et al.. (2024). Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared with a Do-It-Yourself Approach: A Randomized Clinical Trial. UNC Libraries.
4.
LaRose, Jessica Gokee, Amy A. Gorin, Katelyn R Garcia, et al.. (2023). Life events and stress among young adults in weight gain prevention trial.. Health Psychology. 42(5). 314–324. 1 indexed citations
5.
Tate, Deborah F., Lesley D. Lutes, Maria Bryant, et al.. (2022). Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared With a Do-It-Yourself Approach. JAMA Network Open. 5(8). e2226561–e2226561. 10 indexed citations
6.
Valle, Carmina G., Bernardine M. Pinto, Jessica Gokee LaRose, et al.. (2021). Promoting physical activity in young adult cancer survivors using mHealth and adaptive tailored feedback strategies: Design of the Improving Physical Activity after Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) randomized controlled trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 103. 106293–106293. 12 indexed citations
7.
LaRose, Jessica Gokee, Tricia M. Leahey, Autumn Lanoye, et al.. (2021). Behavioral weight loss in emerging adults: Design and rationale for the Richmond Emerging Adults Choosing Health (REACH) randomized clinical trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 107. 106426–106426. 4 indexed citations
8.
Tate, Deborah F., Lesley D. Lutes, Karen E. Hatley, et al.. (2020). Examination of a partial dietary self‐monitoring approach for behavioral weight management. Obesity Science & Practice. 6(4). 353–364. 11 indexed citations
10.
LaRose, Jessica Gokee, Rebecca H. Neiberg, E. Whitney Evans, et al.. (2019). Dietary outcomes within the study of novel approaches to weight gain prevention (SNAP) randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 16(1). 14–14. 4 indexed citations
11.
Phelan, Suzanne, et al.. (2019). Engagement and Weight Loss in a Web and Mobile Program for Low-Income Postpartum Women: Fit Moms/Mamás Activas. Health Education & Behavior. 46(2_suppl). 114S–123S. 10 indexed citations
12.
Gorin, Amy A., Jessica Gokee LaRose, Mark A. Espeland, et al.. (2018). Eating pathology and psychological outcomes in young adults in self-regulation interventions using daily self-weighing.. Health Psychology. 38(2). 143–150. 16 indexed citations
13.
Martin, Chantel L., Deborah F. Tate, Andrew Schaffner, et al.. (2017). Acculturation Influences Postpartum Eating, Activity, and Weight Retention in Low-Income Hispanic Women. Journal of Women s Health. 26(12). 1333–1339. 26 indexed citations
14.
Phelan, Suzanne, Todd Hagobian, Anna Brannen, et al.. (2017). Effect of an Internet-Based Program on Weight Loss for Low-Income Postpartum Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 72(10). 577–579. 6 indexed citations
15.
Tate, Deborah F., Carmina G. Valle, Melissa M. Crane, et al.. (2017). Randomized trial comparing group size of periodic in-person sessions in a remotely delivered weight loss intervention. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 14(1). 144–144. 12 indexed citations
16.
Phelan, Suzanne, Todd Hagobian, Anna Brannen, et al.. (2017). Effect of an Internet-Based Program on Weight Loss for Low-Income Postpartum Women. JAMA. 317(23). 2381–2381. 97 indexed citations
17.
Nezami, Brooke T., Wei Lang, John M. Jakicic, et al.. (2016). The effect of self-efficacy on behavior and weight in a behavioral weight-loss intervention.. Health Psychology. 35(7). 714–722. 60 indexed citations
19.
Wing, Rena R., Deborah F. Tate, Mark A. Espeland, et al.. (2016). Innovative Self-Regulation Strategies to Reduce Weight Gain in Young Adults. JAMA Internal Medicine. 176(6). 755–755. 82 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026