Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources
2004600 citationsKal Raustiala, David G. VictorInternational Organizationprofile →
The Rise of International Regime Complexity
2018183 citationsKaren J. Alter, Kal Raustialaprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Kal Raustiala's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kal Raustiala with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kal Raustiala more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kal Raustiala. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kal Raustiala. The network helps show where Kal Raustiala may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kal Raustiala
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kal Raustiala.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kal Raustiala based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kal Raustiala. Kal Raustiala is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Raustiala, Kal. (2011). The Role of NGOs in International Treaty-Making. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
6.
Raustiala, Kal. (2010). Remarks by Kal Raustiala. Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting. 104. 103–105.2 indexed citations
7.
Munzer, Stephen R. & Kal Raustiala. (2009). The Uneasy Case for Intellectual Property Rights in Traditional Knowledge. SSRN Electronic Journal.15 indexed citations
8.
Raustiala, Kal & Christopher Jon Sprigman. (2009). The Piracy Paradox Revisited. Stanford Law Review. 61(5). 1201.7 indexed citations
Raustiala, Kal. (2004). Police Patrols & (and) Fire Alarms in the NAAEC. Loyola of Los Angeles international & comparative law review. 26(3). 389.14 indexed citations
16.
Raustiala, Kal & David G. Victor. (2004). The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization. 58(2).600 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Raustiala, Kal. (2000). Compliance & Effectiveness in International Regulatory Cooperation. Case Western Reserve journal of international law. 32(3). 387.43 indexed citations
18.
Raustiala, Kal. (2000). Sovereignty and Multilateralism. Chicago journal of international law. 1(2). 18.5 indexed citations
19.
Victor, D.G., Kal Raustiala, & Eugene Β. Skolnikoff. (1998). The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).150 indexed citations
20.
Raustiala, Kal. (1995). The Domestication of International Commitments. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.