K. Riedel

43 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

K. Riedel
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Bioengineering 264
  • Pharmacology 271
  • Infectious Diseases 432
  • Virology 89
  • Electrochemistry 84
Replace Léon Reubsaet with:
Léon Reubsaet Norway
Haitao Lü China
I.J. McGilveray Canada
Patrick J. Faustino United States
C.P.W.G.M. Verwey-van Wissen Netherlands
Marina Venzon Antunes Brazil
Alfred Tonelli United States
Tausif Monif India
Hildegard Spahn‐Langguth Germany
Roland J. W. Meesters Netherlands
K. Riedel relative to Léon Reubsaet Norway Léon Reubsaet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
Léon Reubsaet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. Riedel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Riedel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Riedel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Riedel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Riedel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Riedel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Riedel. The network helps show where K. Riedel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. Riedel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. Riedel Line = papers co-authored together K. Riedel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006126
2 2011106
3 2005105
4 2006101
5 198896
6 201092
7 199073
8 201166
9 199161
10 201353
11 201152
12 198545
13 201241
14 199440
15 199837
16 198335
17 198531
18 199125
19 201424
20 199022

About K. Riedel

K. Riedel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Bioengineering, Infectious Diseases and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (11 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (10 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (7 papers), bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (5 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (5 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (5 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (5 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (264 citations), Pharmacology (271 citations), Infectious Diseases (432 citations), Virology (89 citations) and Electrochemistry (84 citations). K. Riedel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Tanzania. Frequent co-authors include Frieder W. Scheller, Jürgen Burhenne, Reinhard Renneberg, Walter E. Haefeli, Gerd Mikus, H Laufen, Jens Rengelshausen, T. Thomsen, Eleni Aklillu and Anthony R. Tricker. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Analytical Letters, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy and Journal of Basic Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact