Countries citing papers authored by K. N. Ganeshaiah
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of K. N. Ganeshaiah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. N. Ganeshaiah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. N. Ganeshaiah more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. N. Ganeshaiah
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. N. Ganeshaiah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. N. Ganeshaiah. The network helps show where K. N. Ganeshaiah may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. N. Ganeshaiah
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. N. Ganeshaiah.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. N. Ganeshaiah based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with K. N. Ganeshaiah. K. N. Ganeshaiah is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ganeshaiah, K. N., et al.. (2011). Sacred groves in southern eastern ghats, India: Are they better managed than forest reserves?. Tropical Ecology. 52(1). 79–90.19 indexed citations
5.
Priti, V., S. Shweta, Ramesha Thimmappa, et al.. (2010). Attenuation of camptothecin production and negative relation between hyphal biomass and camptothecin content in endophytic fungal strains isolated from Nothapodytes nimmoniana Grahm (Icacinaceae). Current Science. 98(8). 1006–1010.46 indexed citations
Ravikanth, G., et al.. (2009). Prospecting for alternate sources of shikimic acid, a precursor of Tamiflu, a bird-flu drug. Current Science. 96(6). 771–772.18 indexed citations
Shaanker, R. Uma, et al.. (2004). Ecological consequences of forest use: from genes to ecosystem - a case study in the Biligiri Rangaswamy temple wildlife sanctuary, South India. Conservation and Society. 2(2). 347.24 indexed citations
11.
Ganeshaiah, K. N., et al.. (2002). Tectonic activities shape the spatial patchiness in the distribution of global biological diversity. Current Science. 82(1). 76–81.3 indexed citations
12.
Ganeshaiah, K. N., et al.. (2002). Floral resources of Karnataka: a geographic perspective. Current Science. 83(7). 810–813.4 indexed citations
13.
Ganeshaiah, K. N., et al.. (2001). Paternal parents enhance dispersal ability of their progeny in a wind-dispersed species, Tecoma stans L.. Current Science. 81(1). 22–24.2 indexed citations
14.
Murali, K. S., et al.. (1998). Does forest type classification reflect spatial dynamics of vegetation? An analysis using GIS techniques. Current Science. 75(3). 220–227.15 indexed citations
15.
Ganeshaiah, K. N., et al.. (1998). Mapping diversity of ants and root grubs. Current Science. 75(3). 201–204.5 indexed citations
16.
Shaanker, R. Uma & K. N. Ganeshaiah. (1997). CONFLICT BETWEEN PARENT AND OFFSPRING IN PLANTS : PREDICTIONS, PROCESSES AND EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES. Current Science. 72(12). 932–939.24 indexed citations
17.
Shaanker, R. Uma, et al.. (1995). Differential rates of seed abortion among trees of Dalbergia sissoo: role of post-dispersal sibling competition. Current Science. 68(11). 1114–1118.5 indexed citations
18.
Shankar, Uma, et al.. (1993). The 'neighbour effect' and its role in shaping the positional pattern of seed development in fruits: An illustration from the pods of Erythrina suberosa. Current Science. 65(3). 234–238.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.