K. Genser

18.8k total citations
10 papers, 17 citations indexed

About

K. Genser is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, K. Genser has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 17 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 5 papers in Radiation and 3 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in K. Genser's work include Particle Detector Development and Performance (5 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (4 papers) and Advanced Data Storage Technologies (3 papers). K. Genser is often cited by papers focused on Particle Detector Development and Performance (5 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (4 papers) and Advanced Data Storage Technologies (3 papers). K. Genser collaborates with scholars based in United States, Argentina and Switzerland. K. Genser's co-authors include R. Walczak, Andreas Jansson, Rodrigo Castro, H. Wenzel, P. Lebrun, J. C. Yun, S. Lai, J. Estrada, Robert Hatcher and G. Folger and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and Journal of Physics Conference Series.

In The Last Decade

K. Genser

7 papers receiving 17 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
K. Genser United States 3 10 9 5 5 4 10 17
M. Viti Germany 3 13 1.3× 5 0.6× 7 1.4× 5 1.0× 5 1.3× 12 19
S. S. Shimanskiy Russia 3 6 0.6× 14 1.6× 4 0.8× 4 0.8× 3 0.8× 5 16
D. Pellett United States 3 10 1.0× 14 1.6× 10 2.0× 4 0.8× 3 0.8× 4 20
V. R. Kozak Russia 3 15 1.5× 8 0.9× 10 2.0× 7 1.4× 3 0.8× 24 26
Agnieszka Zagoździńska Poland 4 9 0.9× 18 2.0× 10 2.0× 4 0.8× 4 1.0× 9 25
Daichi Naito Japan 4 13 1.3× 9 1.0× 5 1.0× 12 2.4× 6 1.5× 12 26
Y. Ivanisenko Germany 3 13 1.3× 4 0.4× 6 1.2× 8 1.6× 5 1.3× 10 18
Russell Bate United Kingdom 3 9 0.9× 6 0.7× 9 1.8× 10 2.0× 2 0.5× 8 17
A. V. Larionov Russia 3 12 1.2× 9 1.0× 5 1.0× 4 0.8× 3 0.8× 10 19
A.I. Sukhanov United States 2 7 0.7× 7 0.8× 10 2.0× 4 0.8× 2 0.5× 6 14

Countries citing papers authored by K. Genser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Genser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Genser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Genser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Genser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Genser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Genser. The network helps show where K. Genser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Genser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Genser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Genser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Genser. K. Genser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Wenzel, H., et al.. (2024). CaTS: Integration of Geant4 and Opticks. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 295. 11004–11004.
2.
Jun, S. Y., et al.. (2018). GQLink: an implementation of Quantized State Systems (QSS) methods in Geant4. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 1085. 52015–52015. 1 indexed citations
3.
Genser, K., Robert Hatcher, M.H. Kelsey, et al.. (2017). A Software Toolkit to Study Systematic Uncertainties of the Physics Models of the Geant4 Simulation Package. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 898. 42052–42052. 1 indexed citations
4.
Dotti, A., H. Wenzel, K. Genser, et al.. (2017). Software aspects of the Geant4 validation repository. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 898. 42030–42030.
5.
Genser, K., et al.. (2017). Application of State Quantization-Based Methods in HEP Particle Transport Simulation. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 898. 42049–42049. 2 indexed citations
6.
Dotti, A., V. D. Elvira, G. Folger, et al.. (2015). Geant4 Computing Performance Benchmarking and Monitoring. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 664(6). 62021–62021. 2 indexed citations
7.
Genser, K., et al.. (2011). Very high resolution hadron calorimetry. 1177–1182. 4 indexed citations
8.
Trocmé, B., G.E. Cooper, S. M. Farrington, et al.. (2006). CDF II Production Farm Project. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 572(1). 399–401.
9.
Estrada, J., K. Genser, Andreas Jansson, et al.. (2004). Tevatron run II luminosity, emittance and collision point size. 3. 1763–1765. 5 indexed citations
10.
Genser, K. & R. Walczak. (1987). The influence of gas composition, cathode material and geometrical parameters on the operation of a thin multiwire chamber working at high amplification. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 253(2). 264–272. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026