K Forster

454 total citations
9 papers, 331 citations indexed

About

K Forster is a scholar working on Radiation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, K Forster has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 331 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Radiation, 6 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 4 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in K Forster's work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (6 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (2 papers). K Forster is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (6 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (2 papers). K Forster collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Netherlands. K Forster's co-authors include Adam S. Garden, Pei‐Fong Wong, William H. Morrison, K. Kian Ang, Naomi R. Schechter, Geoffrey Zhang, Tzung-Chi Huang, Thomas Guerrero, Paul Geis and Lei Xing and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Medical Physics and Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine.

In The Last Decade

K Forster

9 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
K Forster United States 6 184 160 157 102 55 9 331
M. Tanooka Japan 11 137 0.7× 110 0.7× 93 0.6× 57 0.6× 72 1.3× 44 272
Julie van der Veen Belgium 9 97 0.5× 200 1.3× 184 1.2× 202 2.0× 79 1.4× 13 424
K Zakarian United States 4 163 0.9× 112 0.7× 179 1.1× 149 1.5× 65 1.2× 4 305
Shouping Xu China 11 130 0.7× 157 1.0× 182 1.2× 73 0.7× 53 1.0× 68 316
D. Fransen Netherlands 4 151 0.8× 96 0.6× 176 1.1× 116 1.1× 62 1.1× 9 276
Guoping Shan China 10 123 0.7× 116 0.7× 158 1.0× 102 1.0× 69 1.3× 34 305
Benjamin Rosen United States 11 138 0.8× 220 1.4× 168 1.1× 70 0.7× 36 0.7× 32 344
Rachel McCarroll United States 10 138 0.8× 339 2.1× 323 2.1× 64 0.6× 47 0.9× 19 475
Eva Samsøe Denmark 8 181 1.0× 145 0.9× 199 1.3× 166 1.6× 56 1.0× 29 344
Syed Moinuddin United Kingdom 6 168 0.9× 301 1.9× 272 1.7× 75 0.7× 35 0.6× 16 422

Countries citing papers authored by K Forster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K Forster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K Forster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K Forster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K Forster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K Forster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K Forster. The network helps show where K Forster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K Forster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K Forster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K Forster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K Forster. K Forster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
2.
Forster, K, et al.. (2011). SU‐E‐T‐686: Monte Carlo Study of Material Approximation Introduced Dose Difference in Electron Conformal Therapy Planning. Medical Physics. 38(6Part21). 3648–3648. 1 indexed citations
3.
Bradley, Jeffrey D., Kyounghwa Bae, Noah C. Choi, et al.. (2010). A Phase II Comparative Study of Gross Tumor Volume Definition With or Without PET/CT Fusion in Dosimetric Planning for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Primary Analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0515. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 82(1). 435–441.e1. 75 indexed citations
4.
Zhang, Geoffrey, Tzung-Chi Huang, K Forster, et al.. (2008). Dose mapping: Validation in 4D dosimetry with measurements and application in radiotherapy follow-up evaluation. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 90(1). 25–37. 23 indexed citations
5.
Zhang, Geoffrey, Tzung-Chi Huang, Thomas Guerrero, et al.. (2008). Use of three‐dimensional (3D) optical flow method in mapping 3D anatomic structure and tumor contours across four‐dimensional computed tomography data. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 9(1). 59–69. 31 indexed citations
6.
Huang, Tzung-Chi, et al.. (2006). Semi-automated CT segmentation using optic flow and Fourier interpolation techniques. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 84(2-3). 124–134. 30 indexed citations
7.
Garden, Adam S., K Forster, Pei‐Fong Wong, et al.. (2003). Results of radiotherapy for T2N0 glottic carcinoma: does the “2” stand for twice-daily treatment?. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 55(2). 322–328. 103 indexed citations
8.
Xia, Ping, Paul Geis, Lei Xing, et al.. (1999). Physical characteristics of a miniature multileaf collimator. Medical Physics. 26(1). 65–70. 66 indexed citations
9.
Geis, Paul, K Forster, Ping Xia, et al.. (1997). 2222 Physical characterization of a miniature multileaf collimator. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 39(2). 351–351. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026