K. Ebert

1.6k citations
26 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 17

K. Ebert

26 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

K. Ebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Water Science and Technology 630
  • Biomaterials 247
  • Mechanical Engineering 546
  • Biomedical Engineering 526
  • Organic Chemistry 247
Replace Mariia Dmitrenko with:
Mariia Dmitrenko Russia
E. Di Nicolò Italy
Xin Kong China
Ş. Birgül Tantekin‐Ersolmaz Türkiye
Chunhua Cao China
Alberto Cláudio Habert Brazil
Faizal Soyekwo China
Behrouz Sadatnia Iran
И. Л. Борисов Russia
K. Ebert relative to Mariia Dmitrenko Russia Mariia Dmitrenko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Mariia Dmitrenko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. Ebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Ebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Ebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Ebert. The network helps show where K. Ebert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. Ebert Line = papers co-authored together K. Ebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201323
2 20127
3 2010100
4 200956
5 200967
6 200924
7 200663
8 2006190
9 200636
10 200542
11 200538
12 200522
13 2004144
14 20045
15 2003134
16 200312
17 200116
18
Nanofiltration for the separation of edible oil
199921
19
Thin film composite membranes of glassy polymers for gas separation
19951
20
The preparation of composite membranes with a glassy top layer
19957

About K. Ebert

K. Ebert is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Biomaterials, Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (14 papers), Membrane Separation Technologies (12 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (6 papers), Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques (5 papers), Extraction and Separation Processes (4 papers), Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (3 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (3 papers) and Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (630 citations), Biomaterials (247 citations), Mechanical Engineering (546 citations), Biomedical Engineering (526 citations) and Organic Chemistry (247 citations). K. Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Kristian Buhr, M.F.J. Dijkstra, Herbert Plenio, Shahin Homaeigohar, Detlev Fritsch, Joachim Koll, Anupama Datta, Klaus‐Viktor Peinemann, Volker Abetz and F.P. Cuperus. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Membrane Science, Chemie Ingenieur Technik, Organometallics, Journal of Applied Polymer Science and Separation Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026