K Bostock

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 781 citations indexed

About

K Bostock is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, K Bostock has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 781 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 4 papers in Oncology and 3 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in K Bostock's work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (3 papers). K Bostock is often cited by papers focused on Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (3 papers). K Bostock collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and United States. K Bostock's co-authors include Alan C. Perkins, Keith Neal, Dileep N. Lobo, S.P. Allison, Michael H. Robinson, J D Hardcastle, Lesley Hunt, P. S. Rooney, C B Williams and O Kronbörg and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Gut and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

K Bostock

6 papers receiving 753 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial

2002 706 citations Dileep N. Lobo, K Bostock et al. The Lancet profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
K Bostock United Kingdom	6	630	515	169	143	111	6	781
Paul Older Australia	11	566 0.9×	671 1.3×	280 1.7×	73 0.5×	26 0.2×	19	937
Christopher Snowden United Kingdom	12	379 0.6×	348 0.7×	186 1.1×	75 0.5×	68 0.6×	23	668
Şenol Yavuz Türkiye	14	323 0.5×	351 0.7×	225 1.3×	19 0.1×	63 0.6×	103	672
Amal Bessissow Canada	11	578 0.9×	769 1.5×	211 1.2×	34 0.2×	60 0.5×	23	993
James Prentis United Kingdom	11	520 0.8×	472 0.9×	152 0.9×	168 1.2×	21 0.2×	17	813
Cemil Zencır Türkiye	16	143 0.2×	395 0.8×	49 0.3×	91 0.6×	21 0.2×	51	619
E. Bennett-Guerrero United States	8	399 0.6×	337 0.7×	78 0.5×	19 0.1×	98 0.9×	15	515
Rainer Meierhenrich Germany	16	425 0.7×	488 0.9×	203 1.2×	32 0.2×	54 0.5×	34	838
Rachael Scott United States	8	494 0.8×	520 1.0×	66 0.4×	30 0.2×	121 1.1×	13	667
Robert Capodilupo United States	7	93 0.1×	392 0.8×	69 0.4×	193 1.3×	56 0.5×	14	624

Countries citing papers authored by K Bostock

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K Bostock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K Bostock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K Bostock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K Bostock

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K Bostock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K Bostock. The network helps show where K Bostock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K Bostock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K Bostock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K Bostock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K Bostock. K Bostock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Lobo, Dileep N., K Bostock, David A. Bush, et al.. (2002). Reproducibility and normal ranges for gastric emptying in normal volunteers using a test meal designed for post-operative patients†. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 23(1). 97–101. 10 indexed citations

2.

Lobo, Dileep N., et al.. (2002). Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 359(9320). 1812–1818. 706 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Scholefield, J H, et al.. (1998). Serum ferritin. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 41(8). 1029–1031. 15 indexed citations

4.

Hunt, Lesley, P. S. Rooney, K Bostock, et al.. (1997). Chemical and immunological testing for faecal occult blood in screening subjects at risk of familial colorectal cancer.. Gut. 40(1). 110–112. 7 indexed citations

5.

Robinson, Michael H., C G Marks, P A Farrands, K Bostock, & J D Hardcastle. (1996). Screening for colorectal cancer with an immunological faecal occult blood test: 2-Year follow-up. British journal of surgery. 83(4). 500–501. 16 indexed citations

6.

Robinson, Michael H., O Kronbörg, C B Williams, et al.. (1995). Faecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy in the surveillance of subjects at high risk of colorectal neoplasia. British journal of surgery. 82(3). 318–320. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact