Justin Vines

2.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
36 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Justin Vines is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Justin Vines has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 3 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in Justin Vines's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (32 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (19 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (18 papers). Justin Vines is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (32 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (19 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (18 papers). Justin Vines collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Justin Vines's co-authors include Jan Steinhoff, Alfredo Guevara, Éanna É. Flanagan, Alessandra Buonanno, Alexander Ochirov, Tanja Hinderer, Mohammed Khalil, Chris Kavanagh, Nils Siemonsen and Maarten van de Meent and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

In The Last Decade

Justin Vines

35 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Scattering of spinning black holes from exponentiated sof... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Justin Vines Germany 24 1.7k 1.0k 241 150 149 36 1.8k
Jan Steinhoff Germany 31 2.6k 1.5× 1.3k 1.3× 342 1.4× 317 2.1× 201 1.3× 66 2.8k
S. Bose India 22 1.4k 0.8× 531 0.5× 173 0.7× 209 1.4× 147 1.0× 70 1.5k
Shijun Yoshida Japan 25 1.8k 1.0× 1.2k 1.2× 133 0.6× 87 0.6× 229 1.5× 47 1.8k
Andrea Maselli Italy 32 2.7k 1.6× 1.4k 1.4× 173 0.7× 242 1.6× 174 1.2× 69 2.8k
A. Drago Italy 21 1.1k 0.6× 1.1k 1.1× 397 1.6× 81 0.5× 200 1.3× 78 1.8k
K. G. Arun India 27 2.4k 1.4× 605 0.6× 381 1.6× 297 2.0× 95 0.6× 69 2.4k
Hajime Sotani Japan 29 2.1k 1.2× 637 0.6× 609 2.5× 447 3.0× 184 1.2× 97 2.2k
Aaron Zimmerman United States 21 1.3k 0.7× 664 0.7× 121 0.5× 109 0.7× 101 0.7× 40 1.3k
Norichika Sago Japan 24 1.7k 1.0× 715 0.7× 127 0.5× 44 0.3× 92 0.6× 41 1.8k
A. Sulaksono Indonesia 17 670 0.4× 436 0.4× 112 0.5× 167 1.1× 93 0.6× 86 818

Countries citing papers authored by Justin Vines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Justin Vines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Justin Vines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Justin Vines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Justin Vines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Justin Vines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Justin Vines. The network helps show where Justin Vines may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Justin Vines

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Justin Vines. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Justin Vines based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Justin Vines. Justin Vines is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bern, Zvi, et al.. (2024). Quantum field theory, worldline theory, and spin magnitude change in orbital evolution. Physical review. D. 109(4). 27 indexed citations
2.
Vines, Justin, et al.. (2024). Dynamical implications of the Kerr multipole moments for spinning black holes. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2024(12). 9 indexed citations
3.
Guevara, Alfredo, et al.. (2023). Scattering in black hole backgrounds and higher-spin amplitudes. Part I. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2023(3). 55 indexed citations
4.
Guevara, Alfredo, et al.. (2023). Scattering in black hole backgrounds and higher-spin amplitudes. Part II. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2023(5). 51 indexed citations
5.
Steinhoff, Jan, et al.. (2023). Modeling horizon absorption in spinning binary black holes using effective worldline theory. Physical review. D. 107(8). 35 indexed citations
6.
Compère, Geoffrey, et al.. (2023). Generalized Carter constant for quadrupolar test bodies in Kerr spacetime. SciPost Physics. 15(6). 13 indexed citations
7.
Khalil, Mohammed, Alessandra Buonanno, Jan Steinhoff, & Justin Vines. (2022). Energetics and scattering of gravitational two-body systems at fourth post-Minkowskian order. arXiv (Cornell University). 55 indexed citations
8.
Damgaard, P.H., et al.. (2022). Scattering angles in Kerr metrics. Physical review. D. 106(12). 38 indexed citations
9.
Vines, Justin, et al.. (2022). Conservative and radiative dynamics in classical relativistic scattering and bound systems. Physical Review Research. 4(1). 55 indexed citations
10.
Vines, Justin, et al.. (2022). Scattering of gravitational waves off spinning compact objects with an effective worldline theory. Physical review. D. 106(12). 32 indexed citations
11.
Kavanagh, Chris, et al.. (2020). Gravitational spin-orbit and aligned spin1spin2 couplings through third-subleading post-Newtonian orders. Physical review. D. 102(12). 35 indexed citations
12.
Kavanagh, Chris, et al.. (2020). Gravitational Spin-Orbit Coupling through Third-Subleading Post-Newtonian Order: From First-Order Self-Force to Arbitrary Mass Ratios. Physical Review Letters. 125(1). 11103–11103. 41 indexed citations
13.
Siemonsen, Nils & Justin Vines. (2020). Test black holes, scattering amplitudes, and perturbations of Kerr spacetime. Physical review. D. 101(6). 48 indexed citations
14.
Guevara, Alfredo, Alexander Ochirov, & Justin Vines. (2019). Scattering of spinning black holes from exponentiated soft factors. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2019(9). 201 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Siemonsen, Nils, Jan Steinhoff, & Justin Vines. (2018). Gravitational waves from spinning binary black holes at the leading post-Newtonian orders at all orders in spin. Physical review. D. 97(12). 17 indexed citations
16.
Harte, Abraham I. & Justin Vines. (2016). Generating exact solutions to Einstein’s equation using linearized approximations. Physical review. D. 94(8). 15 indexed citations
17.
Vines, Justin & Éanna É. Flanagan. (2013). First-post-Newtonian quadrupole tidal interactions in binary systems. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 88(2). 86 indexed citations
18.
Vines, Justin, Éanna É. Flanagan, & Tanja Hinderer. (2011). Post-1-Newtonian tidal effects in the gravitational waveform from binary inspirals. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 83(8). 218 indexed citations
19.
Vines, Justin, Reeta Vyas, & Surendra Singh. (2006). Conditional homodyne detection of light with squeezed quadrature fluctuations. Physical Review A. 74(2). 5 indexed citations
20.
Vines, Justin, et al.. (2003). Modes of vibration of air-driven free reeds in transient and steady state oscillation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 114(4_Supplement). 2348–2348.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026