Justin Reedy

811 total citations
39 papers, 398 citations indexed

About

Justin Reedy is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Justin Reedy has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 398 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Communication, 19 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 18 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Justin Reedy's work include Social Media and Politics (23 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (10 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (8 papers). Justin Reedy is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (23 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (10 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (8 papers). Justin Reedy collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and China. Justin Reedy's co-authors include John Gastil, Katherine R. Knobloch, Chris Wells, Katherine Cramer Walsh, Katherine J. Cramer, Carolyn Lee, Robert C. Richards, Vanessa Y. Hiratsuka, Julie A. Beans and Erika Blacksher and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

Justin Reedy

36 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Justin Reedy United States 11 199 193 122 41 31 39 398
Stephanie Burkhalter United States 5 237 1.2× 156 0.8× 111 0.9× 9 0.2× 38 1.2× 10 372
Todd Kelshaw United States 5 183 0.9× 131 0.7× 80 0.7× 9 0.2× 30 1.0× 6 302
Alice Siu United States 11 133 0.7× 145 0.8× 123 1.0× 19 0.5× 11 0.4× 25 328
David F. Damore United States 10 220 1.1× 161 0.8× 420 3.4× 24 0.6× 8 0.3× 27 553
Kai Spiekermann United Kingdom 9 28 0.1× 175 0.9× 150 1.2× 15 0.4× 3 0.1× 28 425
Stephen Coleman United Kingdom 9 275 1.4× 148 0.8× 131 1.1× 6 0.1× 20 0.6× 25 403
Anker Brink Lund Denmark 7 407 2.0× 306 1.6× 137 1.1× 10 0.2× 6 0.2× 51 586
Katherine R. Knobloch United States 12 288 1.4× 178 0.9× 238 2.0× 6 0.1× 72 2.3× 28 482
Nicolás M. Somma Chile 10 125 0.6× 318 1.6× 194 1.6× 5 0.1× 15 0.5× 29 464
Ricardo Fabrino Mendonça Brazil 12 281 1.4× 294 1.5× 219 1.8× 9 0.2× 50 1.6× 75 572

Countries citing papers authored by Justin Reedy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Justin Reedy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Justin Reedy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Justin Reedy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Justin Reedy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Justin Reedy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Justin Reedy. The network helps show where Justin Reedy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Justin Reedy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Justin Reedy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Justin Reedy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Justin Reedy. Justin Reedy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Reedy, Justin, Chris Anderson, & Matthew C. Nowlin. (2023). Technical issues and engagement processes: support for citizen and expert deliberation regarding the management of nuclear waste. Frontiers in Communication. 8. 2 indexed citations
2.
Miousse, Isabelle R., Gunnar Boysen, Candace L. Williams, et al.. (2023). Climate Change and New Challenges for Rural Communities: Particulate Matter Matters. Sustainability. 15(23). 16192–16192. 3 indexed citations
3.
Reedy, Justin, et al.. (2023). Pandemic Politics: Immigration, Framing, and Covid-19. 8(2). 246–266. 1 indexed citations
4.
Gastil, John, et al.. (2023). Deliberative panels as a source of public knowledge: A large-sample test of the Citizens’ Initiative Review. PLoS ONE. 18(7). e0288188–e0288188. 6 indexed citations
5.
Gastil, John, Chris Anderson, Laura W. Black, et al.. (2022). Convening a Minipublic During a Pandemic: A Case Study of the Oregon Citizens’ Assembly Pilot on COVID-19 Recovery. Digital Government Research and Practice. 3(2). 1–19. 4 indexed citations
6.
Richards, Robert C., et al.. (2022). Psychological Phenomena in Democratic Deliberation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 18(2). 4 indexed citations
7.
Reedy, Justin, et al.. (2022). A Typology of Reasoning in Deliberative Processes: A Study of the 2010 Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 18(2). 1 indexed citations
8.
Blacksher, Erika, Vanessa Y. Hiratsuka, Justin Reedy, et al.. (2021). Deliberations with American Indian and Alaska Native People about the Ethics of Genomics: An Adapted Model of Deliberation Used with Three Tribal Communities in the United States. AJOB Empirical Bioethics. 12(3). 164–178. 14 indexed citations
9.
Reedy, Justin, et al.. (2021). Citizen deliberation at South Carolina’s ‘Our Coastal Future Forum’: Talking through risk related to climate change. Journal of Risk Research. 25(6). 764–777. 2 indexed citations
10.
Piercy, Cameron W., et al.. (2021). A Typology of Reasoning in Deliberative Processes: A Study of the 2010 Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review. Journal of Deliberative Democracy.
11.
Reedy, Justin, et al.. (2020). Deliberations About Genomic Research and Biobanks With Citizens of the Chickasaw Nation. Frontiers in Genetics. 11. 466–466. 13 indexed citations
12.
Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y., et al.. (2020). An Alaska Native community’s views on genetic research, testing, and return of results: Results from a public deliberation. PLoS ONE. 15(3). e0229540–e0229540. 20 indexed citations
13.
Gastil, John, et al.. (2017). Assessing the Electoral Impact of the 2010 Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review. American Politics Research. 46(3). 534–563. 53 indexed citations
14.
Reedy, Justin, John Gastil, & Michael Gabbay. (2013). Terrorism and Small Groups: An Analytical Framework for Group Disruption. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
15.
Knobloch, Katherine R., John Gastil, Justin Reedy, & Katherine Cramer Walsh. (2013). Did They Deliberate? Applying an Evaluative Model of Democratic Deliberation to the Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
16.
Gastil, John, Chris Wells, Justin Reedy, & Carolyn Lee. (2009). Information Distortion and Voting Choices: Assessing the Origins and Effects of Factual Beliefs in an Initiative Election. SSRN Electronic Journal.
17.
Wells, Chris, Justin Reedy, John Gastil, & Carolyn Lee. (2009). Information Distortion and Voting Choices: The Origins and Effects of Factual Beliefs in Initiative Elections. Political Psychology. 30(6). 953–969. 37 indexed citations
18.
Gastil, John, Justin Reedy, Donald Braman, & Dan M. Kahan. (2008). Deliberation Across the Cultural Divide: Assessing the Potential for Reconciling Conflicting Cultural Orientations to Reproductive Technology. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations
19.
Reedy, Justin & Chris Wells. (2008). Information, the internet, and direct democracy. 173–188. 5 indexed citations
20.
Gastil, John, Justin Reedy, & Chris Wells. (2007). When Good Voters Make Bad Policies: Assessing and Improving the Deliberative Quality of Initiative Elections. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephanie Burkhalter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Todd Kelshaw Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alice Siu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David F. Damore Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kai Spiekermann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephen Coleman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anker Brink Lund Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katherine R. Knobloch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nicolás M. Somma Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ricardo Fabrino Mendonça
Rankless by CCL
2026