Jürgen Augustin

4.4k total citations
112 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Jürgen Augustin is a scholar working on Ecology, Soil Science and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Jürgen Augustin has authored 112 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 68 papers in Ecology, 39 papers in Soil Science and 28 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Jürgen Augustin's work include Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (59 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (37 papers) and Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (25 papers). Jürgen Augustin is often cited by papers focused on Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (59 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (37 papers) and Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (25 papers). Jürgen Augustin collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Estonia and Denmark. Jürgen Augustin's co-authors include W. Merbach, Birgit W. Hütsch, Ülo Mander, Mathias Hoffmann, Sille Teiter, Dominika Lewicka‐Szczebak, Reinhard Well, Krista Lõhmus, Jörg Gelbrecht and Michael Sommer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Science of The Total Environment and Global Change Biology.

In The Last Decade

Jürgen Augustin

105 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jürgen Augustin Germany 29 1.5k 896 641 641 528 112 2.8k
Hua Xu China 35 996 0.7× 2.0k 2.3× 830 1.3× 984 1.5× 797 1.5× 94 3.5k
Rima B. Franklin United States 23 1.8k 1.2× 484 0.5× 531 0.8× 348 0.5× 294 0.6× 47 2.8k
Ember M. Morrissey United States 30 1.9k 1.3× 1.3k 1.5× 389 0.6× 609 1.0× 226 0.4× 62 3.1k
Alan J. Sexstone United States 21 938 0.6× 988 1.1× 906 1.4× 342 0.5× 231 0.4× 40 2.7k
A. P. Rowland United Kingdom 23 740 0.5× 600 0.7× 650 1.0× 559 0.9× 441 0.8× 49 2.4k
Emily Graham United States 29 1.7k 1.1× 683 0.8× 562 0.9× 381 0.6× 312 0.6× 75 2.9k
Nathalie Fenner United Kingdom 27 3.3k 2.2× 910 1.0× 1.3k 2.0× 1.0k 1.6× 610 1.2× 49 4.7k
Joachim Ingwersen Germany 33 633 0.4× 1.2k 1.3× 524 0.8× 716 1.1× 748 1.4× 101 3.0k
Heiner Flessa Germany 28 1.2k 0.8× 2.2k 2.4× 821 1.3× 470 0.7× 474 0.9× 44 3.2k
Olivier Mathieu France 25 998 0.7× 1.1k 1.3× 398 0.6× 623 1.0× 202 0.4× 51 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Jürgen Augustin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jürgen Augustin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jürgen Augustin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jürgen Augustin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jürgen Augustin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jürgen Augustin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jürgen Augustin. The network helps show where Jürgen Augustin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jürgen Augustin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jürgen Augustin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jürgen Augustin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jürgen Augustin. Jürgen Augustin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Augustin, Jürgen, et al.. (2025). A new, low-cost ground-based NDVI sensor for manual and automated crop monitoring. Smart Agricultural Technology. 11. 100892–100892. 1 indexed citations
2.
Kaštovská, Eva, Michal Choma, Gerrit Angst, et al.. (2023). Root but not shoot litter fostered the formation of mineral-associated organic matter in eroded arable soils. Soil and Tillage Research. 235. 105871–105871. 9 indexed citations
3.
Hoffmann, Mathias, et al.. (2023). The unexpected long period of elevated CH4 emissions from an inundated fen meadow ended only with the occurrence of cattail (Typha latifolia). Global Change Biology. 29(13). 3678–3691. 9 indexed citations
4.
Hoffmann, Mathias, et al.. (2023). Benefits of a robotic chamber system for determining evapotranspiration in an erosion-affected, heterogeneous cropland. Hydrology and earth system sciences. 27(21). 3851–3873. 4 indexed citations
5.
Schaller, Jörg, et al.. (2023). Arctic soil CO2 release during freeze-thaw cycles modulated by silicon and calcium. The Science of The Total Environment. 870. 161943–161943. 6 indexed citations
6.
Frindte, Katharina, Steffen Kolb, Michael Sommer, Jürgen Augustin, & Claudia Knief. (2023). Spatial patterns of prokaryotic communities in kettle hole soils follow soil horizonation. Applied Soil Ecology. 185. 104796–104796. 1 indexed citations
7.
Rillig, Matthias C., et al.. (2021). Microplastic fibers affect dynamics and intensity of CO2 and N2O fluxes from soil differently. Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin). 1(1). 98 indexed citations
8.
Frick, Daniel A., Rainer Remus, Michael Sommer, et al.. (2020). Silicon uptake and isotope fractionation dynamics by crop species. Biogeosciences. 17(24). 6475–6490. 20 indexed citations
9.
Ghirardo, Andrea, Jörg‐Peter Schnitzler, Claas Nendel, et al.. (2017). Net ecosystem fluxes and composition of biogenic volatile organic compounds over a maize field–interaction of meteorology and phenological stages. GCB Bioenergy. 9(11). 1627–1643. 20 indexed citations
10.
Fiedler, Sebastian, et al.. (2017). Potential short-term losses of N 2 O and N 2 from high concentrations of biogas digestate in arable soils. SOIL. 3(3). 161–176. 15 indexed citations
11.
Hoffmann, Mathias, et al.. (2017). A simple calculation algorithm to separate high-resolution CH 4 flux measurements into ebullition- and diffusion-derived components. Atmospheric measurement techniques. 10(1). 109–118. 31 indexed citations
13.
Lewicka‐Szczebak, Dominika, Jens Dyckmans, Jan Kaiser, et al.. (2016). Oxygen isotope fractionation during N 2 O production by soil denitrification. Biogeosciences. 13(4). 1129–1144. 54 indexed citations
14.
Minke, Merten, et al.. (2016). Water level, vegetation composition, and plant productivity explaingreenhouse gas fluxes in temperate cutover fens after inundation. Biogeosciences. 13(13). 3945–3970. 49 indexed citations
16.
Minke, Merten, et al.. (2014). Greenhouse gas emissions of drained fen peatlands in Belarus are controlled by water table, land use, and annual weather conditions. EGUGA. 887.
17.
Leifeld, Jens, Elisa Albiac Borraz, Mathias Hoffmann, et al.. (2014). Are C-loss rates from drained peatlands constant over time? The additive value of soil profile based and flux budget approach. 5 indexed citations
18.
Eickenscheidt, Tim, Annette Freibauer, J. Heinichen, Jürgen Augustin, & Matthias Drösler. (2014). Short-term effects of biogas digestate and cattle slurry application on greenhouse gas emissions from high organic carbon grasslands. 6 indexed citations
19.
Giebels, M., et al.. (2009). Anthropogenic impact on the carbon cycle of fen peatlands in NE-Germany. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 340.
20.
Mander, Ülo, Sille Teiter, Valdo Kuusemets, et al.. (2003). Nitrogen And Phosphorus Budgets In A Subsurface Flow WastewaterTreatment Wetland. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. 61. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026