Citations per year, relative to Jure Vidmar Jure Vidmar (= 1×)
peers
Brian D. Lepard
Countries citing papers authored by Jure Vidmar
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jure Vidmar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jure Vidmar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jure Vidmar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jure Vidmar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jure Vidmar. The network helps show where Jure Vidmar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jure Vidmar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jure Vidmar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jure Vidmar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jure Vidmar. Jure Vidmar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vidmar, Jure. (2019). Unilateral Revocability in Wightman: Fixing Article 50 with Constitutional Tools. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
2.
Vidmar, Jure. (2017). Brexit, Democracy, and Human Rights: The Law Between Secession and Treaty Withdrawal. SSRN Electronic Journal. 35(2). 425–457.3 indexed citations
3.
Vidmar, Jure. (2017). Catalonia: The Way Forward is Comparative Constitutional Rather than International Legal Argument. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).2 indexed citations
4.
Vidmar, Jure, et al.. (2016). Brexit: Is everything going to change in law, so that very little would change in fact?. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).
Vidmar, Jure. (2013). The Importance of Legal Criteria for Statehood: A Rejoinder to Dapo Akande. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).2 indexed citations
11.
Vidmar, Jure. (2012). Territorial Integrity and the Law of Statehood. SSRN Electronic Journal. 44(4). 697–747.1 indexed citations
12.
Vidmar, Jure. (2012). Democratic Statehood in International Law. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
Vidmar, Jure. (2011). South Sudan and the International Legal Framework Governing the Emergence and Delimitation of New States. SSRN Electronic Journal. 47(3). 541–559.1 indexed citations
Vidmar, Jure. (2010). Remedial Secession in International Law: Theory and (Lack of) Practice. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6(1). 37–56.10 indexed citations
18.
Vidmar, Jure. (2010). Confining New International Borders in the Practice of Post-1990 State Creations. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 70(2). 319–356.1 indexed citations
19.
Vidmar, Jure. (2009). International Legal Responses to Kosovo's Declaration of Independence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 42(3). 779–851.3 indexed citations
20.
Vidmar, Jure. (2008). Democratic Transition and Democratic Consolidation in Slovenia. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.