Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Phosphate Availability Alters Architecture and Causes Changes in Hormone Sensitivity in the Arabidopsis Root System
2002579 citationsJune Simpson, Luís Herrera‐Estrella et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of June Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by June Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites June Simpson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by June Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by June Simpson. The network helps show where June Simpson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of June Simpson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of June Simpson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of June Simpson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with June Simpson. June Simpson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Aguirre-Mancilla, César Leobardo, et al.. (2010). LA DOMESTICACIÓN DE PLANTAS EN MÉXICO: COMPARACIÓN DE LA FORMA CULTIVADA Y SILVESTRE DE BYRSONIMA CRASSIFOLIA (MALPIGHIACEAE). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 239–256.3 indexed citations
Rodríguez-Guerra, Raúl, Jorge Alberto Acosta Gallegos, Mario Martín González-Chavira, & June Simpson. (2006). Patotipos de Colletotrichum lindemuthianum y su implicación en la generación de cultivares resistentes de frijol. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 32(1). 101–114.6 indexed citations
15.
Rodríguez-Guerra, Raúl, Jorge Alberto Acosta Gallegos, Mario Martín González-Chavira, & June Simpson. (2006). Pathotypes of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum and their implications for the development of resistant bean cultivars. 32(1). 101–114.2 indexed citations
16.
Pecina‐Quintero, Víctor, et al.. (2005). Diversidad genética en soya del trópico húmedo de México determinada con marcadores AFLP. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).1 indexed citations
17.
Zavaleta-Mejía, Emma, et al.. (2005). Antagonism of Cladosporium sp. against Puccinia horiana Henn. causal agent of white rust of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzvelev).. Revista mexicana de fitopatología(en línea)/Revista mexicana de fitopatología. 23(1). 79–86.
18.
Simpson, June, et al.. (2004). Capacidad de Anastomosis de Cepas del Hongo Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (Sacc. et Magn.) Scrib., Agente Causal de la Antracnosis del Frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 22(1). 37–43.4 indexed citations
19.
Simpson, June, et al.. (1997). Uso de marcadores moleculares en la agronomía. 16. 53–57.
20.
Simpson, June & Luís Herrera‐Estrella. (1990). Light‐regulated gene expression. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 9(1). 95–109.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.