Julius–Robert Lukas
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Neurology top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Roland BlumerRobert MayrMartin AignerMichaela DenkHarald HeinzlIsabella BaumgartnerJohannes StreicherRichard Wasicky
- Topics
- Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (10 papers)Vestibular and auditory disorders (6 papers)Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Comparative NeurologyJournal of Histochemistry & CytochemistryInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
- Partner nations
- AustriaSwitzerlandGermany
In The Last Decade
Julius–Robert Lukas
13 papers receiving 425 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 282
- Neurology 251
- Neurology 97
- Ophthalmology 88
- Molecular Biology 74
Countries citing papers authored by Julius–Robert Lukas
This map shows the geographic impact of Julius–Robert Lukas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius–Robert Lukas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius–Robert Lukas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julius–Robert Lukas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius–Robert Lukas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius–Robert Lukas. The network helps show where Julius–Robert Lukas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julius–Robert Lukas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julius–Robert Lukas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julius–Robert Lukas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julius–Robert Lukas. Julius–Robert Lukas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | Innervated myotendinous cylinders in human extraocular muscles. | 59 |
| 8 | Muscle fiber types of human extraocular muscles: a histochemical and immunohistochemical study. | 57 |
| 9 | Fine structural analysis of extraocular muscle spindles of a two-year-old human infant. | 32 |
| 10 | 52 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | Number and distribution of neuromuscular spindles in human extraocular muscles. | 73 |
About Julius–Robert Lukas
Julius–Robert Lukas is a scholar working on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (10 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (6 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (251 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (282 citations) and Ophthalmology (88 citations). Julius–Robert Lukas has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Roland Blumer, Robert Mayr, Martin Aigner, Michaela Denk, Harald Heinzl, Isabella Baumgartner, Johannes Streicher, Richard Wasicky, Kadriye Zeynep Konakci and Michael Blumer. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.