Julius Schoop

1.1k total citations
53 papers, 834 citations indexed

About

Julius Schoop is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Julius Schoop has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 834 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 27 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 22 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Julius Schoop's work include Advanced machining processes and optimization (44 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (26 papers) and Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques (22 papers). Julius Schoop is often cited by papers focused on Advanced machining processes and optimization (44 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (26 papers) and Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques (22 papers). Julius Schoop collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Türkiye. Julius Schoop's co-authors include I.S. Jawahir, Wisley Falco Sales, T. John Balk, Navneet Khanna, David A. Puleo, I.G. Brown, Prassan Shah, Boyang Huang, Leonardo Rosa Ribeiro da Silva and Álisson Rocha Machado and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Materials Processing Technology, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture and CIRP Annals.

In The Last Decade

Julius Schoop

50 papers receiving 790 citations

Peers

Julius Schoop

EEE

IME

Chetan Agrawal India

Adrián Rodríguez Spain

P. Sivaiah India

Manoj Kumar Sinha India

Xiaobin Cui China

Mohd Azlan Suhaimi Malaysia

Ampara Aramcharoen Singapore

M. Hüseyin Çetin Türkiye

A. K. Balaji United States

M. Manjaiah India

Chetan Agrawal India

Julius Schoop

836 ×1.1

492 ×1.5

EEE

232 ×0.9

192 ×0.9

128 ×0.9

IME

Citations per year, relative to Julius Schoop Julius Schoop (= 1×) peers Chetan Agrawal

Countries citing papers authored by Julius Schoop

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julius Schoop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius Schoop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius Schoop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julius Schoop

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius Schoop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius Schoop. The network helps show where Julius Schoop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julius Schoop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julius Schoop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julius Schoop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julius Schoop. Julius Schoop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Schoop, Julius, et al.. (2025). New insights into variable thermomechanical loads due to chip formation size effects in machining of Ti-6Al4V alloy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 340. 118869–118869.

Schoop, Julius & I.S. Jawahir. (2025). Physics-based modelling and validation of dynamically varying thermal and mechanical residual stress fields in finish machining of aerospace alloys. CIRP Annals. 74(1). 109–112.

Jawahir, I.S., Helmi Attia, Martin Dix, et al.. (2025). Revisiting machinability assessment: Towards total machining performance. CIRP Annals. 74(2). 817–842. 1 indexed citations

Schoop, Julius, et al.. (2024). Inconel 625 sustainable milling surface integrity and the dependence on alloy processing route. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 130(9-10). 4493–4512. 3 indexed citations

Tuysuz, Oguzhan, et al.. (2024). An improved machining temperature prediction model for aerospace alloys: Effect of cutting edge radius and tool wear. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 133. 1100–1110. 2 indexed citations

Schoop, Julius, et al.. (2024). Digital process twins: a modular approach for surface conditioning and process optimization. Production Engineering. 18(2). 367–380.

Wimmer, Matthias, Julius Schoop, & Michael F. Zaeh. (2024). In-situ characterization and modeling of machining-induced residual stresses in peripheral milling of Ti–6Al–4V with rounded cutting edges. Production Engineering. 19(3-4). 511–524. 2 indexed citations

Mativenga, Paul, Julius Schoop, I.S. Jawahir, et al.. (2024). Engineered design of cutting tool material, geometry, and coating for optimal performance and customized applications: A review. CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technology. 52. 212–228. 13 indexed citations

Schoop, Julius, et al.. (2023). In-situ characterization of tool temperatures using in-tool integrated thermoresistive thin-film sensors. Production Engineering. 17(2). 319–328. 2 indexed citations

10.

Khanna, Navneet, et al.. (2023). Assessment of additive and subtractive sustainable manufacturing of Inconel 625. Tribology International. 186. 108655–108655. 13 indexed citations

11.

Schoop, Julius, et al.. (2022). A Novel Approach for Real-Time Quality Monitoring in Machining of Aerospace Alloy through Acoustic Emission Signal Transformation for DNN. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 6(1). 18–18. 16 indexed citations

12.

Schoop, Julius, et al.. (2021). In-Situ Calibrated Digital Process Twin Models for Resource Efficient Manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 144(4). 8 indexed citations

13.

Schoop, Julius, et al.. (2021). AI-enabled dynamic finish machining optimization for sustained surface integrity. Manufacturing Letters. 29. 42–46. 11 indexed citations

14.

Sales, Wisley Falco, Julius Schoop, Leonardo Rosa Ribeiro da Silva, Álisson Rocha Machado, & I.S. Jawahir. (2020). A review of surface integrity in machining of hardened steels. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 58. 136–162. 64 indexed citations

15.

Schoop, Julius, et al.. (2018). Correlation of surface integrity with processing parameters and advanced interface cooling/lubrication in burnishing of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies. 5(1). 53–66. 11 indexed citations

16.

Schoop, Julius, Wisley Falco Sales, & I.S. Jawahir. (2017). High speed cryogenic finish machining of Ti - 6Al4V with polycrystalline diamond tools. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 250. 1–8. 81 indexed citations

17.

Sales, Wisley Falco, Julius Schoop, & I.S. Jawahir. (2017). Tribological behavior of PCD tools during superfinishing turning of the Ti6Al4V alloy using cryogenic, hybrid and flood as lubri-coolant environments. Tribology International. 114. 109–120. 37 indexed citations

18.

Jawahir, I.S., David A. Puleo, & Julius Schoop. (2016). Cryogenic Machining of Biomedical Implant Materials for Improved Functional Performance, Life and Sustainability. Procedia CIRP. 46. 7–14. 26 indexed citations

19.

Schoop, Julius, I.S. Jawahir, & T. John Balk. (2015). Size effects in finish machining of porous powdered metal for engineered surface quality. Precision Engineering. 44. 180–191. 13 indexed citations

20.

Huang, Boyang, et al.. (2014). Enhancing the Surface Integrity of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy through Cryogenic Burnishing. Procedia CIRP. 13. 243–248. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact