Julie Postma

47 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers

Julie Postma
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Speech and Hearing 78
  • Research and Theory 10
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 147
  • General Health Professions 230
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 33
Replace Laura Anderko with:
Laura Anderko United States
Katherine Chang Hong Kong
Jeanne Leffers United States
Jane Rich Australia
Stephanie Chalupka United States
Heather Klusaritz United States
Melissa L. Potestio Canada
Pamela B. DeGuzman United States
Rosemary V. Chaudry United States
Amin Ghanbarnejad Iran
Julie Postma relative to Laura Anderko United States Laura Anderko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Laura Anderko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julie Postma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Postma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Postma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Postma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Postma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Postma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Postma. The network helps show where Julie Postma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julie Postma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julie Postma Line = papers co-authored together Julie Postma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009103
2 201128
3 202226
4 201024
5 201120
6 201518
7 201815
8 201415
9 200914
10 200813
11 201313
12 201913
13 202212
14 201312
15
Incorporating environmental health into nursing practice: a case study on indoor air quality.
201012
16 201412
17 201611
18 202211
19 201810
20 200810

About Julie Postma

Julie Postma is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Plant Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate Change and Health Impacts (15 papers), Community Health and Development (7 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (6 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (6 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (6 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (5 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (78 citations), Research and Theory (10 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (147 citations), General Health Professions (230 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (33 citations). Julie Postma has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Gail M. Kieckhefer, Catherine J. Karr, Patricia Butterfield, Janessa M. Graves, Tamara Odom‐Maryon, Celestina Barbosa‐Leiker, Vickie D. Ybarra, Robin A. Evans‐Agnew, Elizabeth Schenk and Phillip W. Butterfield. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Asthma, Public Health Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Progress in community health partnerships and Journal of Adolescent Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact