Julie Borsack

584 total citations
22 papers, 332 citations indexed

About

Julie Borsack is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Julie Borsack has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 332 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 12 papers in Information Systems and 11 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Julie Borsack's work include Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (9 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (8 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (7 papers). Julie Borsack is often cited by papers focused on Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (9 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (8 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (7 papers). Julie Borsack collaborates with scholars based in United States. Julie Borsack's co-authors include Kazem Taghva, Allen Condit, Thomas A. Nartker, W. Bruce Croft and Jeffrey Coombs and has published in prestigious journals such as Information Processing & Management, ACM Transactions on Information Systems and International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR).

In The Last Decade

Julie Borsack

20 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julie Borsack United States 11 226 177 123 26 20 22 332
Allen Condit United States 9 193 0.9× 144 0.8× 106 0.9× 23 0.9× 16 0.8× 19 279
Hwee-Boon Low Singapore 4 244 1.1× 65 0.4× 122 1.0× 39 1.5× 8 0.4× 7 285
F. Cesarini Italy 9 88 0.4× 234 1.3× 40 0.3× 31 1.2× 10 0.5× 23 293
Cliff Brunk United States 5 154 0.7× 56 0.3× 54 0.4× 46 1.8× 14 0.7× 7 210
Antoon Bosselaers Belgium 8 162 0.7× 104 0.6× 36 0.3× 32 1.2× 15 0.8× 22 207
Benne de Weger Netherlands 6 107 0.5× 71 0.4× 64 0.5× 29 1.1× 14 0.7× 12 169
Yves Chiaramella France 7 128 0.6× 42 0.2× 64 0.5× 54 2.1× 7 0.3× 20 191
John Broglio United States 8 267 1.2× 42 0.2× 192 1.6× 70 2.7× 13 0.7× 11 344
Xinrui Ge China 10 231 1.0× 67 0.4× 150 1.2× 10 0.4× 47 2.4× 19 281
Atulya Velivelli United States 6 186 0.8× 56 0.3× 102 0.8× 30 1.2× 3 0.1× 11 277

Countries citing papers authored by Julie Borsack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Borsack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Borsack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Borsack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Borsack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Borsack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Borsack. The network helps show where Julie Borsack may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie Borsack

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie Borsack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie Borsack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie Borsack. Julie Borsack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Taghva, Kazem, et al.. (2007). Title extraction and generation from OCR'd documents. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6500. 65000R–65000R. 1 indexed citations
2.
Taghva, Kazem, et al.. (2004). Ontology-based classification of email. 194–198. 19 indexed citations
3.
Taghva, Kazem, Thomas A. Nartker, & Julie Borsack. (2004). Information access in the presence of OCR errors. 1–8. 12 indexed citations
4.
Taghva, Kazem, Julie Borsack, Thomas A. Nartker, & Allen Condit. (2004). The role of manually-assigned keywords in query expansion. Information Processing & Management. 40(3). 441–458. 8 indexed citations
5.
Taghva, Kazem, et al.. (2003). The impact of running headers and footers on proximity searching. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5296. 1–1. 1 indexed citations
6.
Nartker, Thomas A., et al.. (2003). <title>OCR correction based on document level knowledge</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5010. 103–110. 8 indexed citations
7.
Taghva, Kazem, et al.. (2003). A comparison of automatic and manual zoning. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR). 6(4). 230–235. 2 indexed citations
8.
Taghva, Kazem, et al.. (2003). Ontology-based Classification of Email. Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno). 3 indexed citations
9.
Taghva, Kazem, et al.. (2000). <title>Evaluating text categorization in the presence of OCR errors</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4307. 68–74. 13 indexed citations
10.
Taghva, Kazem, Julie Borsack, & Allen Condit. (1999). Effectiveness of thesauri-aided retrieval. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3651. 134–134. 3 indexed citations
11.
Taghva, Kazem, et al.. (1998). The MANICURE document processing system. 2 indexed citations
12.
Taghva, Kazem, et al.. (1998). <title>MANICURE document processing system</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3305. 179–184. 3 indexed citations
13.
Taghva, Kazem, Julie Borsack, & Allen Condit. (1996). Evaluation of model-based retrieval effectiveness with OCR text. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 14(1). 64–93. 39 indexed citations
14.
Taghva, Kazem, Julie Borsack, & Allen Condit. (1996). Effects of OCR errors on ranking and feedback using the vector space model. Information Processing & Management. 32(3). 317–327. 50 indexed citations
15.
Taghva, Kazem, et al.. (1995). POST-EDITING THROUGH APPROXIMATION AND GLOBAL CORRECTION. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence. 9(6). 911–923. 10 indexed citations
16.
Taghva, Kazem, Allen Condit, & Julie Borsack. (1995). <title>Evaluation of an automatic markup system</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2422. 317–327. 3 indexed citations
17.
Taghva, Kazem, Julie Borsack, & Allen Condit. (1994). Results of applying probabilistic IR to OCR text. International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 202–211. 39 indexed citations
18.
Taghva, Kazem, et al.. (1994). The effects of noisy data on text retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1). 50–58. 37 indexed citations
19.
Taghva, Kazem, Julie Borsack, & Allen Condit. (1994). <title>Expert system for automatically correcting OCR output</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2181. 270–278. 26 indexed citations
20.
Croft, W. Bruce, et al.. (1993). An Evaluation of Information Retrieval Accuracy with Simulated OCR Output. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026