Julia Schaft

750 total citations
9 papers, 616 citations indexed

About

Julia Schaft is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Schaft has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 616 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Genetics and 1 paper in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Julia Schaft's work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (7 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (6 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers). Julia Schaft is often cited by papers focused on CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (7 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (6 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers). Julia Schaft collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Canada. Julia Schaft's co-authors include F. van der Hoeven, A. Francis Stewart, Stefan Glaser, Konstantinos Anastassiadis, Sandra Lubitz, Ruth Ashery‐Padan, Peter Gruß, Kristina Vintersten, Rein Aasland and Siew‐Lan Ang and has published in prestigious journals such as Development, Molecular Biology of the Cell and genesis.

In The Last Decade

Julia Schaft

9 papers receiving 608 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Julia Schaft Germany	6	541	148	42	32	29	9	616
Jelle Verbeeck Belgium	12	346 0.6×	170 1.1×	34 0.8×	21 0.7×	18 0.6×	16	469
Lan-Hsin Wang Taiwan	9	323 0.6×	78 0.5×	59 1.4×	15 0.5×	40 1.4×	12	416
Mathew P. Dixon Australia	11	726 1.3×	214 1.4×	38 0.9×	63 2.0×	55 1.9×	14	864
Christy Stotler United States	5	234 0.4×	98 0.7×	41 1.0×	13 0.4×	23 0.8×	8	329
Isabel Martín Caballero United Kingdom	8	662 1.2×	166 1.1×	22 0.5×	9 0.3×	29 1.0×	10	715
Guillaume Corre France	14	321 0.6×	118 0.8×	28 0.7×	20 0.6×	62 2.1×	28	428
Anna M. Siemiatkowska Netherlands	14	392 0.7×	126 0.9×	64 1.5×	12 0.4×	54 1.9×	24	461
Cynthia J. Faust United States	11	533 1.0×	198 1.3×	40 1.0×	8 0.3×	18 0.6×	14	594
Davood Zare‐Abdollahi Iran	10	224 0.4×	61 0.4×	30 0.7×	31 1.0×	12 0.4×	26	308
Liesbeth Backx Belgium	10	183 0.3×	196 1.3×	31 0.7×	15 0.5×	26 0.9×	14	333

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Schaft

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Schaft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Schaft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Schaft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Schaft

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Schaft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Schaft. The network helps show where Julia Schaft may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Schaft

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Schaft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Schaft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Schaft. Julia Schaft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Dumevska, Biljana, et al.. (2016). Derivation of Huntington Disease affected Genea090 human embryonic stem cell line. Stem Cell Research. 16(2). 519–521. 3 indexed citations

2.

Dumevska, Biljana, et al.. (2016). Derivation of Huntington Disease affected Genea091 human embryonic stem cell line. Stem Cell Research. 16(2). 449–451. 2 indexed citations

3.

Bradley, Cara K., Julia Schaft, Tammie K. Roy, Biljana Dumevska, & Teija Peura. (2014). Derivation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines from Vitrified Human Blastocysts. Methods in molecular biology. 1307. 1–23. 5 indexed citations

4.

Peura, Teija, Julia Schaft, Biljana Dumevska, & Tomas Stojanov. (2011). Generation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Current Protocols in Stem Cell Biology. 16(1). Unit1A.5–Unit1A.5. 3 indexed citations

5.

Peura, Teija, Julia Schaft, & Tomas Stojanov. (2009). Derivation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines from Vitrified Human Embryos. Methods in molecular biology. 584. 21–54. 5 indexed citations

6.

Lubitz, Sandra, Stefan Glaser, Julia Schaft, A. Francis Stewart, & Konstantinos Anastassiadis. (2007). Increased Apoptosis and Skewed Differentiation in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Lacking the Histone Methyltransferase Mll2. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 18(6). 2356–2366. 87 indexed citations

7.

Glaser, Stefan, Julia Schaft, Sandra Lubitz, et al.. (2006). Multiple epigenetic maintenance factors implicated by the loss of Mll2 in mouse development. Development. 133(8). 1423–1432. 223 indexed citations

8.

Testa, Giuseppe, Julia Schaft, F. van der Hoeven, et al.. (2004). A reliable lacZ expression reporter cassette for multipurpose, knockout‐first alleles. genesis. 38(3). 151–158. 161 indexed citations

9.

Schaft, Julia, Ruth Ashery‐Padan, F. van der Hoeven, Peter Gruß, & A. Francis Stewart. (2001). Efficient FLP recombination in mouse ES cells and oocytes. genesis. 31(1). 6–10. 127 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact