Julia Melke

1.7k total citations
38 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Julia Melke is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Melke has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 28 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and 12 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Julia Melke's work include Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (28 papers), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (19 papers) and Advanced battery technologies research (10 papers). Julia Melke is often cited by papers focused on Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (28 papers), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (19 papers) and Advanced battery technologies research (10 papers). Julia Melke collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Julia Melke's co-authors include Christina Roth, Helmut Ehrenberg, Joachim Langner, Ditty Dixon, Anna Fischer, Michael Brüns, Alexei Nefedov, Christof Wöll, Peter Jakes and Igor Derr and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Advanced Functional Materials and Journal of Power Sources.

In The Last Decade

Julia Melke

38 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julia Melke Germany 21 1.1k 749 375 321 303 38 1.4k
Daniel Alves Dalla Corte France 22 1.7k 1.6× 634 0.8× 389 1.0× 254 0.8× 398 1.3× 32 2.0k
Chitturi Venkateswara Rao Puerto Rico 14 1.9k 1.8× 936 1.2× 647 1.7× 419 1.3× 277 0.9× 18 2.3k
Frieder Scheiba Germany 24 1.5k 1.4× 663 0.9× 401 1.1× 441 1.4× 517 1.7× 53 1.8k
Yonglang Guo China 25 1.2k 1.1× 743 1.0× 502 1.3× 277 0.9× 342 1.1× 69 1.7k
Inhui Hwang United States 17 1.6k 1.5× 513 0.7× 467 1.2× 245 0.8× 386 1.3× 47 1.9k
Daying Guo China 24 1.3k 1.2× 752 1.0× 525 1.4× 225 0.7× 114 0.4× 58 1.7k
Da‐Hee Kwak South Korea 24 1.3k 1.2× 926 1.2× 370 1.0× 385 1.2× 108 0.4× 52 1.5k
Jiseok Kwon South Korea 23 1.8k 1.7× 1.5k 2.0× 725 1.9× 272 0.8× 300 1.0× 70 2.5k
Chunguang Kuai China 23 1.6k 1.5× 1.5k 2.0× 691 1.8× 316 1.0× 259 0.9× 35 2.4k
Alexandra Pătru Switzerland 19 804 0.8× 825 1.1× 261 0.7× 141 0.4× 107 0.4× 26 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Melke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Melke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Melke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Melke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Melke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Melke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Melke. The network helps show where Julia Melke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Melke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Melke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Melke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Melke. Julia Melke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fietzek, H., G. Schmidt, J. Christen, et al.. (2024). Catalyst Interaction in Unitized Regenerative Fuel Cells. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 171(5). 54523–54523. 1 indexed citations
2.
Šešelj, Nedjeljko, Erlend Bertheussen, Christoffer Mølleskov Pedersen, et al.. (2024). Beyond RDE characterisation – Unveiling IrRu/ATO OER catalyst stability with a GDE setup. Electrochimica Acta. 501. 144773–144773. 1 indexed citations
3.
Zeng, Zhiqiang, S. Esmael Balaghi, Philipp Hügenell, et al.. (2023). Ultrahigh Mass Activity Pt Entities Consisting of Pt Single atoms, Clusters, and Nanoparticles for Improved Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Small. 19(29). e2205885–e2205885. 61 indexed citations
4.
Pittkowski, Rebecca K., Johanna Schröder, Jonathan Quinson, et al.. (2023). Influence of Temperature on the Performance of Carbon- and ATO-supported Oxygen Evolution Reaction Catalysts in a Gas Diffusion Electrode Setup. ACS Catalysis. 13(11). 7568–7577. 15 indexed citations
5.
Gomes, Bruna Ferreira, Martin Prokop, Tomáš Bystroň, et al.. (2022). Following Adsorbed Intermediates on a Platinum Gas Diffusion Electrode in H3PO3-Containing Electrolytes Using In Situ X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. ACS Catalysis. 12(18). 11472–11484. 12 indexed citations
6.
Stoeckel, Daniela, et al.. (2022). Impact of catalyst support morphology on 3D electrode structure and polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell performance. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(2). 2 indexed citations
9.
Thomann, Ralf, et al.. (2020). Directing nitrogen-doped carbon support chemistry for improved aqueous phase hydrogenation catalysis. Catalysis Science & Technology. 10(14). 4794–4808. 17 indexed citations
10.
Melke, Julia, et al.. (2019). Synthesis of Pt@TiO2 nanocomposite electrocatalysts for enhanced methanol oxidation by hydrophobic nanoreactor templating. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 21(25). 13555–13568. 19 indexed citations
11.
Jurzinsky, Tilman, Markus Kübler, Michael Brüns, et al.. (2019). Functionalization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes with indazole. Electrochimica Acta. 298. 884–892. 12 indexed citations
12.
Yurchenko, Olena, et al.. (2018). High electrocatalytic activity of metal-free and non-doped hierarchical carbon nanowalls towards oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochimica Acta. 269. 657–667. 25 indexed citations
13.
Sahraie, Nastaran Ranjbar, Julia Melke, Detre Teschner, et al.. (2018). Polyformamidine‐Derived Non‐Noble Metal Electrocatalysts for Efficient Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Advanced Functional Materials. 28(22). 57 indexed citations
14.
Jand, Sara Panahian, et al.. (2016). DRIFTS study of CO adsorption on Pt nanoparticles supported by DFT calculations. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A Chemical. 426. 1–9. 97 indexed citations
15.
Langner, Joachim, Michael Brüns, Ditty Dixon, et al.. (2016). Surface properties and graphitization of polyacrylonitrile based fiber electrodes affecting the negative half-cell reaction in vanadium redox flow batteries. Journal of Power Sources. 321. 210–218. 86 indexed citations
16.
Melke, Julia, et al.. (2015). CO Adsorption on Platinum Nanoparticles - the Importance of Size Distribution Studied with in-Situ DRIFTS and DFT Calculations. ECS Transactions. 69(17). 249–253. 9 indexed citations
17.
Melke, Julia, Peter Jakes, Joachim Langner, et al.. (2014). Carbon materials for the positive electrode in all-vanadium redox flow batteries. Carbon. 78. 220–230. 95 indexed citations
18.
Ramaker, D. E., et al.. (2014). Following ORR intermediates adsorbed on a Pt cathode catalyst during break-in of a PEM fuel cell by in operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 16(27). 13645–13653. 54 indexed citations
19.
20.
Melke, Julia, et al.. (2009). The use of in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy in applied fuel cell research. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry. 40(5). 877–883. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026