Jule Specht

41 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jule Specht
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 93
  • Applied Psychology 200
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 476
  • Clinical Psychology 714
  • Social Psychology 529
Replace Roos Hutteman with:
Roos Hutteman Netherlands
Anne K. Reitz Netherlands
Marie Hennecke Germany
Nathan W. Hudson United States
Melıkşah Demır United States
Pamela S. Schmutte United States
Julia Zimmermann Germany
Margherita Lanz Italy
Loraine F. Lavallee Canada
Vivian Dzokoto United States
Jule Specht relative to Roos Hutteman Netherlands Roos Hutteman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Roos Hutteman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jule Specht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jule Specht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jule Specht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jule Specht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jule Specht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jule Specht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jule Specht. The network helps show where Jule Specht may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jule Specht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jule Specht Line = papers co-authored together Jule Specht links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014191
2 2014183
3 2014147
4 2014117
5 201491
6 201681
7 201263
8 201759
9 201045
10 201640
11 202036
12 201129
13 201525
14 202022
15 202119
16 201616
17 201914
18 20129
19 20228
20 20218

About Jule Specht

Jule Specht is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Traits and Psychology (22 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (14 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (5 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (93 citations), Applied Psychology (200 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (476 citations), Clinical Psychology (714 citations) and Social Psychology (529 citations). Jule Specht has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ulrich Orth, Roos Hutteman, Maike Luhmann, Anne K. Reitz, Marie Hennecke, Eva Asselmann, Stefan C. Schmukle, Boris Egloff, Julia Zimmermann and Christian Kandler. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Personality, Journal of Personality, Social Psychological and Personality Science, Emotion and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact