Juergen Kraemer

485 total citations
11 papers, 351 citations indexed

About

Juergen Kraemer is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Juergen Kraemer has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 351 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 5 papers in Pharmacology and 4 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Juergen Kraemer's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (4 papers). Juergen Kraemer is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (4 papers). Juergen Kraemer collaborates with scholars based in Germany and Canada. Juergen Kraemer's co-authors include Daniel Kolditz, J. Ludwig, Albrecht Molsberger, Konrad Streitberger, Steffen Witte, Carmen Schade‐Brittinger, M. Haake, Wolfram Teske, Robert R. Kraemer and G. Schmid and has published in prestigious journals such as Spine, European Spine Journal and Ergonomics.

In The Last Decade

Juergen Kraemer

10 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Juergen Kraemer Germany	7	264	224	168	54	24	11	351
Alexander Breen United Kingdom	11	175 0.7×	234 1.0×	83 0.5×	54 1.0×	37 1.5×	39	300
Conor W. O’Neill United States	12	285 1.1×	320 1.4×	174 1.0×	44 0.8×	3 0.1×	18	455
Charles A. Lantz United States	8	173 0.7×	213 1.0×	181 1.1×	18 0.3×	18 0.8×	9	345
Philip Maurer United States	10	288 1.1×	281 1.3×	241 1.4×	126 2.3×	21 0.9×	22	526
Thomas R. Saullo United States	5	575 2.2×	555 2.5×	321 1.9×	48 0.9×	8 0.3×	6	673
Robert E. Windsor United States	10	204 0.8×	135 0.6×	193 1.1×	13 0.2×	6 0.3×	17	387
Robin McKenzie New Zealand	5	151 0.6×	247 1.1×	117 0.7×	14 0.3×	73 3.0×	6	313
Robert R. Crowell United States	7	258 1.0×	288 1.3×	166 1.0×	45 0.8×	57 2.4×	12	412
Michael Mac Millan United States	9	177 0.7×	111 0.5×	199 1.2×	49 0.9×	9 0.4×	14	318
Sang-Ki Chung South Korea	4	314 1.2×	191 0.9×	261 1.6×	21 0.4×	4 0.2×	7	406

Countries citing papers authored by Juergen Kraemer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Juergen Kraemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juergen Kraemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juergen Kraemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Juergen Kraemer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juergen Kraemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juergen Kraemer. The network helps show where Juergen Kraemer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Juergen Kraemer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Juergen Kraemer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Juergen Kraemer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Juergen Kraemer. Juergen Kraemer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Theodoridis, Theodoros & Juergen Kraemer. (2019). Spinal Injection Techniques.

2.

Baraliakos, Xenofon, et al.. (2010). Microsurgical nerve root decompression in scoliotic lumbar spines—the relationship between important anatomical structures in correlation to imaging and implications for daily practice: anatomic cadaveric study. Journal of Neurosurgery Spine. 13(1). 123–132. 5 indexed citations

3.

Theodoridis, Theodoros, et al.. (2009). Spinal Injection Techniques. 2 indexed citations

4.

Molsberger, Albrecht, Konrad Streitberger, Juergen Kraemer, et al.. (2006). Designing an Acupuncture Study: II. The Nationwide, Randomized, Controlled German Acupuncture Trials on Low-Back Pain and Gonarthrosis. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 12(8). 733–742. 23 indexed citations

5.

Kraemer, Juergen, et al.. (2003). MR Imaging of the Lumbar Spine. 2 indexed citations

6.

Kraemer, Juergen, et al.. (2002). MR Imaging of the Lumbar Spine: A Teaching Atlas. 8 indexed citations

7.

Kraemer, Juergen, et al.. (1997). Lumbar epidural perineural injection: a new technique. European Spine Journal. 6(5). 357–361. 111 indexed citations

8.

Kraemer, Juergen. (1995). Natural Course and Prognosis of Intervertebral Disc Diseases. Spine. 20(6). 635–639. 57 indexed citations

9.

Kraemer, Juergen, et al.. (1985). Water and Electrolyte Content of Human Intervertebral Discs Under Variable Load. Spine. 10(1). 69–71. 119 indexed citations

10.

Kraemer, Juergen. (1985). Dynamic characteristics of the vertebral column, effects of prolonged loading. Ergonomics. 28(1). 95–97. 17 indexed citations

11.

Kraemer, Juergen, et al.. (1982). Lumbar Intradiscal Instillation With Aprotinin. Spine. 7(1). 73–73. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact