Ju Wan Kim

25 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

Ju Wan Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering 4
  • Polymers and Plastics 78
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 25
  • Materials Chemistry 152
  • Media Technology 28
Replace Jing‐Heng Chen with:
Jing‐Heng Chen Taiwan
Zhiyang Song China
Victor Fourman Israel
Hansol Jang South Korea
Amanpreet Kaur United States
A. R. Ganesan India
Yudong Wang China
Patrick Altschuh Germany
Changling Wang China
Md. Ashraful Haque Bangladesh
Ju Wan Kim relative to Jing‐Heng Chen Taiwan Jing‐Heng Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Jing‐Heng Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ju Wan Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ju Wan Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ju Wan Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ju Wan Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ju Wan Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ju Wan Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ju Wan Kim. The network helps show where Ju Wan Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ju Wan Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ju Wan Kim Line = papers co-authored together Ju Wan Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009124
2 200692
3 200965
4 201024
5 201719
6 201214
7 201311
8 20139
9 20189
10 20127
11 20076
12 20126
13 20194
14 20184
15 20082
16 20112
17 20152
18 20182
19 20102
20 20241

About Ju Wan Kim

Ju Wan Kim is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanical Engineering, Media Technology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 28 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Holography and Microscopy (8 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (8 papers), Image Processing Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (4 papers), Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks (3 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (3 papers), Fiber-reinforced polymer composites (3 papers) and Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear Energy and Engineering (4 citations), Polymers and Plastics (78 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (25 citations), Materials Chemistry (152 citations) and Media Technology (28 citations). Ju Wan Kim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Young‐Seak Lee, Ji Sun Im, Byeong Ha Lee, Sang Jin Kim, Jeong Min Lee, Young Chang Nho, Phil Hyun Kang, Young Seak Lee, Young Ho Kim and Soo‐Jin Park. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, ETRI Journal, Sensors, Optics Express and Optics Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact