Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Food choices, health and environment: Effects of cutting Europe's meat and dairy intake
2014569 citationsHenk Westhoek, J.P. Lesschen et al.Global Environmental Changeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J.P. Lesschen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.P. Lesschen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.P. Lesschen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.P. Lesschen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.P. Lesschen. The network helps show where J.P. Lesschen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.P. Lesschen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.P. Lesschen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.P. Lesschen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J.P. Lesschen. J.P. Lesschen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Forster, Daniel E., et al.. (2012). Next phase of the European Climate Change Programme: Analysis of member states actions to implement the effort sharing decision and options for further community-wide measures. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.11 indexed citations
Kuikman, P.J., et al.. (2011). LULUCF values under the Kyoto Protocol : background document in preparation of the National Inventory Report 2011 (reporting year 2009). Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
Lesschen, J.P., P.J. Kuikman, Peter Smith, R.L.M. Schils, & D.A. Oudendag. (2009). Quantification of mitigation potentials of agricultural practices for Europe. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 5956.1 indexed citations
17.
Lesschen, J.P., et al.. (2009). Bodemgerelateerde emissie van broeikasgassen in Drenthe : de huidige situatie. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.2 indexed citations
18.
Vries, W. de, J. Kros, J.C.H. Voogd, et al.. (2009). Comparing predictions of nitrogen and green house gas fluxes in response to changes in live stock, land cover and land management using models at a national, European and global scale. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
19.
Cammeraat, Erik, J.P. Lesschen, Bas van Wesemael, & Gonzalo G. Barberá. (2008). The impact of vegetation succession on soil parameters and its consequences for desertification remediation. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).1 indexed citations
20.
Roy, Rabindra N., et al.. (2003). Assessment of soil nutrient balance : approaches and methodologies. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.98 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.