Joyce Dijs-Elsinga

3.4k total citations
8 papers, 408 citations indexed

About

Joyce Dijs-Elsinga is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Joyce Dijs-Elsinga has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 408 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Health Professions, 2 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 2 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Joyce Dijs-Elsinga's work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers). Joyce Dijs-Elsinga is often cited by papers focused on Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers). Joyce Dijs-Elsinga collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands. Joyce Dijs-Elsinga's co-authors include J. Kievit, Perla J. Marang‐van de Mheen, H.J. Smeets, Wilma Otten, Wendeline J. van der Made, Richard A. van Lingen, Michel H. Hof, Chantal W.P.M. Hukkelhoven, Marije Hogeveen and R. Vree and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Medical Decision Making.

In The Last Decade

Joyce Dijs-Elsinga

7 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joyce Dijs-Elsinga Netherlands 6 160 112 84 81 77 8 408
Harold D. Miller United States 7 191 1.2× 51 0.5× 55 0.7× 184 2.3× 14 0.2× 13 449
Zoe Dettrick Australia 11 138 0.9× 151 1.3× 29 0.3× 27 0.3× 21 0.3× 17 299
Theodore Stefos United States 11 157 1.0× 17 0.2× 60 0.7× 131 1.6× 29 0.4× 23 412
Katya Anne Shackelford United States 4 153 1.0× 136 1.2× 41 0.5× 63 0.8× 14 0.2× 4 384
Sheetal Sharma United Kingdom 10 66 0.4× 140 1.3× 63 0.8× 19 0.2× 131 1.7× 44 401
Andrea N. Simpson Canada 14 131 0.8× 92 0.8× 279 3.3× 42 0.5× 19 0.2× 59 652
Olatunde Aremu United Kingdom 10 99 0.6× 160 1.4× 12 0.1× 31 0.4× 45 0.6× 18 398
Laura Makaroff United States 11 179 1.1× 21 0.2× 37 0.4× 166 2.0× 34 0.4× 16 471
Mirjana Varjačić Serbia 8 78 0.5× 74 0.7× 44 0.5× 49 0.6× 17 0.2× 34 284
Asri C. Adisasmita Indonesia 13 85 0.5× 346 3.1× 130 1.5× 12 0.1× 52 0.7× 59 517

Countries citing papers authored by Joyce Dijs-Elsinga

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joyce Dijs-Elsinga's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joyce Dijs-Elsinga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joyce Dijs-Elsinga more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joyce Dijs-Elsinga

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joyce Dijs-Elsinga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joyce Dijs-Elsinga. The network helps show where Joyce Dijs-Elsinga may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joyce Dijs-Elsinga

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joyce Dijs-Elsinga. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joyce Dijs-Elsinga based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joyce Dijs-Elsinga. Joyce Dijs-Elsinga is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Hof, Michel H., et al.. (2018). From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 220(4). 383.e1–383.e17. 146 indexed citations
2.
Maas, Nicoline van der, et al.. (2015). Safety of vaccination against influenza A (H1N1) during pregnancy in the Netherlands: results on pregnancy outcomes and infant's health: cross‐sectional linkage study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 123(5). 709–717. 22 indexed citations
3.
Groot, Ingrid B. de, Wilma Otten, Joyce Dijs-Elsinga, et al.. (2012). Choosing between Hospitals. Medical Decision Making. 32(6). 764–778. 43 indexed citations
4.
Dijs-Elsinga, Joyce, et al.. (2011). [Quality of care and operative complications: comparison of the results of 3 medical departments].. PubMed. 155. A1703–A1703. 2 indexed citations
5.
Mheen, Perla J. Marang‐van de, Joyce Dijs-Elsinga, Wilma Otten, et al.. (2010). The importance of experienced adverse outcomes on patients' future choice of a hospital for surgery. BMJ Quality & Safety. 19(6). e16–e16. 22 indexed citations
6.
Mheen, Perla J. Marang‐van de, Joyce Dijs-Elsinga, Wilma Otten, et al.. (2010). The Relative Importance of Quality of Care Information When Choosing a Hospital for Surgical Treatment. Medical Decision Making. 31(6). 816–827. 63 indexed citations
7.
Dijs-Elsinga, Joyce, Wilma Otten, H.J. Smeets, et al.. (2010). Choosing a Hospital for Surgery: The Importance of Information on Quality of Care. Medical Decision Making. 30(5). 544–555. 110 indexed citations
8.
Assendelft, Willem JJ, S.P. Verloove-Vanhorick, K.M. van der Pal‐de Bruin, Joyce Dijs-Elsinga, & Lieke C. de Jong‐Potjer. (1999). Preconception counselling in general practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026