Joshua Steer

492 total citations
17 papers, 296 citations indexed

About

Joshua Steer is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Joshua Steer has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 296 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 6 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Joshua Steer's work include Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (15 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (14 papers) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (5 papers). Joshua Steer is often cited by papers focused on Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (15 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (14 papers) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (5 papers). Joshua Steer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Joshua Steer's co-authors include Alex Dickinson, Peter Worsley, Martin Browne, A.J. Sobey, Laura Diment, Robin G. Morris, Maggie Donovan‐Hall, Cheryl Metcalf, Katherine Williams and A.J. Chipperfield and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Materials and Journal of Anatomy.

In The Last Decade

Joshua Steer

16 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Joshua Steer United Kingdom	10	241	69	57	46	25	17	296
Jake B. McLean United States	11	291 1.2×	40 0.6×	45 0.8×	43 0.9×	14 0.6×	19	315
Xavier Bonnet France	16	331 1.4×	187 2.7×	29 0.5×	122 2.7×	20 0.8×	54	514
Laura Diment United Kingdom	8	252 1.0×	118 1.7×	30 0.5×	18 0.4×	38 1.5×	18	360
Chung-Huang Yu Taiwan	7	148 0.6×	140 2.0×	14 0.2×	50 1.1×	9 0.4×	24	315
Linda Paternò Italy	9	348 1.4×	63 0.9×	29 0.5×	40 0.9×	21 0.8×	18	402
Ziyun Ding United Kingdom	11	223 0.9×	127 1.8×	14 0.2×	23 0.5×	3 0.1×	27	317
Michele Ibrahimi Italy	4	215 0.9×	52 0.8×	23 0.4×	33 0.7×	15 0.6×	8	250
Max K. Shepherd United States	12	561 2.3×	35 0.5×	177 3.1×	52 1.1×	6 0.2×	25	593
Benjamin Michaud Canada	11	165 0.7×	129 1.9×	57 1.0×	10 0.2×	7 0.3×	32	327
Alejandro F. Azocar United States	6	271 1.1×	22 0.3×	45 0.8×	15 0.3×	8 0.3×	10	299

Countries citing papers authored by Joshua Steer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joshua Steer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joshua Steer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joshua Steer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joshua Steer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joshua Steer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joshua Steer. The network helps show where Joshua Steer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joshua Steer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joshua Steer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joshua Steer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joshua Steer. Joshua Steer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Donovan‐Hall, Maggie, Joshua Steer, Peter Worsley, et al.. (2025). Evidence-Generated Sockets for Transtibial Prosthetic Limbs Compared With Conventional Computer-Aided Designs: A Multiple-Methods Study From the Patient’s Perspective. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies. 12. e69962–e69962.

Dickinson, Alex, et al.. (2024). Insights into the spectrum of transtibial prosthetic socket design from expert clinicians and their digital records. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5. 1354069–1354069. 1 indexed citations

Dickinson, Alex, et al.. (2023). Toward standardized methods for prosthetic socket mechanical testing. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 47(1). 1–2. 3 indexed citations

Cutti, Andrea Giovanni, et al.. (2023). Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 47(1). 3–12. 7 indexed citations

Chipperfield, A.J., et al.. (2021). Developing a control framework for self-adjusting prosthetic sockets incorporating tissue injury risk estimation and generalized predictive control. Biomedical Engineering Letters. 12(1). 59–73. 3 indexed citations

Dickinson, Alex, et al.. (2021). Characterising Residual Limb Morphology and Prosthetic Socket Design Based on Expert Clinician Practice. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(4). 280–299. 22 indexed citations

Dickinson, Alex, et al.. (2020). Selecting Appropriate 3D Scanning Technologies for Prosthetic Socket Design and Transtibial Residual Limb Shape Characterization. JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 34(1). 33–43. 21 indexed citations

Steer, Joshua, et al.. (2020). Developing an Analogue Residual Limb for Comparative DVC Analysis of Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Designs. Materials. 13(18). 3955–3955. 12 indexed citations

Steer, Joshua, Peter Worsley, Martin Browne, & Alex Dickinson. (2020). Key considerations for finite element modelling of the residuum–prosthetic socket interface. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 45(2). 138–146. 14 indexed citations

10.

Williams, Katherine, Neil J. Gostling, Joshua Steer, Richard O. C. Oreffo, & Philipp Schneider. (2020). Quantifying intracortical bone microstructure: A critical appraisal of 2D and 3D approaches for assessing vascular canals and osteocyte lacunae. Journal of Anatomy. 238(3). 653–668. 12 indexed citations

11.

Steer, Joshua, et al.. (2020). ampscan: A lightweight Python package for shape analysis of prosthetics and orthotics. The Journal of Open Source Software. 5(48). 2060–2060. 13 indexed citations

12.

Steer, Joshua, Peter Worsley, Martin Browne, & Alex Dickinson. (2019). Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 1—population-based evaluation of transtibial prosthetic sockets by FEA-driven surrogate modelling. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 19(4). 1331–1346. 43 indexed citations

13.

Steer, Joshua, et al.. (2019). Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 2—generating person-specific candidate designs using multi-objective genetic algorithms. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 19(4). 1347–1360. 28 indexed citations

14.

Chipperfield, A.J., et al.. (2019). Predictive Control for an Active Prosthetic Socket informed by FEA-based Tissue Damage Risk Estimation. PubMed. 32. 2073–2076. 6 indexed citations

15.

Dickinson, Alex, Joshua Steer, & Peter Worsley. (2017). Finite element analysis of the amputated lower limb: A systematic review and recommendations. Medical Engineering & Physics. 43(1). 1–18. 80 indexed citations

16.

Dickinson, Alex, et al.. (2016). Registering methodology for imaging and analysis of residual-limb shape after transtibial amputation. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 53(2). 207–218. 29 indexed citations

17.

Worsley, Peter, et al.. (2015). Classifying residual limb shape in transtibial amputees. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact