Joshua E. Smith

2.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
22 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Joshua E. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Joshua E. Smith has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Molecular Biology, 12 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 5 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. Recurrent topics in Joshua E. Smith's work include Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (14 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (12 papers) and Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (5 papers). Joshua E. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (14 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (12 papers) and Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (5 papers). Joshua E. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and China. Joshua E. Smith's co-authors include Weihong Tan, Colin D. Medley, Suwussa Bamrungsap, Yanrong Wu, Dihua Shangguan, Lin Wang, Zhiwen Tang, Kemin Wang, Charles Lofton and Zhiwen Tang and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Analytical Chemistry and Langmuir.

In The Last Decade

Joshua E. Smith

22 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

Gold Nanoparticle-Based Colorimetric Assay for the Direct... 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joshua E. Smith United States 15 1.5k 1.2k 751 357 281 22 2.3k
Colin D. Medley United States 20 2.4k 1.6× 1.2k 1.0× 534 0.7× 302 0.8× 214 0.8× 32 2.9k
Mohammed Ibrahim Shukoor United States 21 909 0.6× 913 0.8× 703 0.9× 337 0.9× 447 1.6× 31 2.0k
Sadia Afrin Khan United States 18 1.0k 0.7× 1.3k 1.1× 838 1.1× 791 2.2× 285 1.0× 24 2.2k
Hongje Jang South Korea 29 1.1k 0.7× 1.2k 1.1× 1.2k 1.6× 370 1.0× 250 0.9× 97 2.6k
Brian Creran United States 16 639 0.4× 792 0.7× 743 1.0× 449 1.3× 352 1.3× 18 1.8k
Zhibei Qu China 23 896 0.6× 677 0.6× 1.4k 1.8× 382 1.1× 320 1.1× 53 2.5k
Ruo‐Can Qian China 30 1.5k 1.0× 970 0.8× 947 1.3× 299 0.8× 121 0.4× 89 2.7k
Liansheng Ling China 29 1.6k 1.1× 852 0.7× 499 0.7× 168 0.5× 115 0.4× 80 2.1k
Mahdieh Yazdani United States 19 805 0.5× 770 0.7× 559 0.7× 153 0.4× 444 1.6× 27 1.9k
Zhen Zou China 29 1.6k 1.0× 1.1k 1.0× 1.2k 1.6× 196 0.5× 355 1.3× 75 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Joshua E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joshua E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joshua E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joshua E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joshua E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joshua E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joshua E. Smith. The network helps show where Joshua E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joshua E. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joshua E. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joshua E. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joshua E. Smith. Joshua E. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Figura, Nicholas, Joshua E. Smith, & Ya-Yu Tsai. (2018). Mechanisms of, and Adjuvants for, Bone Pain. Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America. 32(3). 447–458. 17 indexed citations
2.
Portman, Diane, Kristine A. Donovan, Priya Gopalan, et al.. (2018). Design and rational for the precision medicine guided treatment for cancer pain pragmatic clinical trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 68. 7–13. 13 indexed citations
3.
Mirau, Peter A., Joshua E. Smith, Jorge L. Chávez, et al.. (2017). Structured DNA Aptamer Interactions with Gold Nanoparticles. Langmuir. 34(5). 2139–2146. 49 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Joshua E., et al.. (2017). Illicit substance use and opioid misuse in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 35(31_suppl). 205–205. 2 indexed citations
5.
Davis, Mellar P., et al.. (2016). Pseudobulbar Affect or Depression in Dementia?. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 51(5). 954–958. 7 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Joshua E., Jorge L. Chávez, Joshua A. Hagen, & Nancy Kelley‐Loughnane. (2016). Design and Development of Aptamer–Gold Nanoparticle Based Colorimetric Assays for In-the-field Applications. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 9 indexed citations
7.
Martin, Jennifer A., et al.. (2015). A Method for Selecting Structure-switching Aptamers Applied to a Colorimetric Gold Nanoparticle Assay. Journal of Visualized Experiments. e52545–e52545. 15 indexed citations
9.
Bettencourt‐Dias, Ana de, et al.. (2013). Turning on Lanthanide Luminescence via Nanoencapsulation. Inorganic Chemistry. 52(11). 6311–6318. 22 indexed citations
10.
Medley, Colin D., et al.. (2012). A DNA-conjugated magnetic nanoparticle assay for assessing genotoxicity. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 404(8). 2233–9. 5 indexed citations
11.
Medley, Colin D., Suwussa Bamrungsap, Weihong Tan, & Joshua E. Smith. (2011). Aptamer-Conjugated Nanoparticles for Cancer Cell Detection. Analytical Chemistry. 83(3). 727–734. 145 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Joshua E., Kim E. Sapsford, Weihong Tan, & Frances S. Ligler. (2010). Optimization of antibody-conjugated magnetic nanoparticles for target preconcentration and immunoassays. Analytical Biochemistry. 410(1). 124–132. 44 indexed citations
13.
Medley, Colin D., Joshua E. Smith, Zhiwen Tang, et al.. (2008). Gold Nanoparticle-Based Colorimetric Assay for the Direct Detection of Cancerous Cells. Analytical Chemistry. 80(4). 1067–1072. 503 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Yan, Jilin, M.‐Carmen Estévez, Joshua E. Smith, et al.. (2007). Dye-doped nanoparticles for bioanalysis. Nano Today. 2(3). 44–50. 316 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Joshua E., Colin D. Medley, Zhiwen Tang, et al.. (2007). Aptamer-Conjugated Nanoparticles for the Collection and Detection of Multiple Cancer Cells. Analytical Chemistry. 79(8). 3075–3082. 294 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Joshua E., et al.. (2006). Aptamer-Conjugated Nanoparticles for Selective Collection and Detection of Cancer Cells. Analytical Chemistry. 78(9). 2918–2924. 355 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Joshua E., Lin Wang, & Weihong Tan. (2006). Bioconjugated silica-coated nanoparticles for bioseparation and bioanalysis. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 25(9). 848–855. 103 indexed citations
19.
Wang, Lin, Kemin Wang, Swadeshmukul Santra, et al.. (2006). Watching Silica Nanoparticles Glow in the Biological World. Analytical Chemistry. 78(3). 646–654. 293 indexed citations
20.
Drake, Timothy J., et al.. (2004). Functionalized nanoparticles for liquid atmospheric pressure matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization peptide analysis. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 18(20). 2367–2374. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026