Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Joshua Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joshua Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joshua Bishop more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joshua Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joshua Bishop. The network helps show where Joshua Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joshua Bishop
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joshua Bishop.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joshua Bishop based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joshua Bishop. Joshua Bishop is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bishop, Joshua, et al.. (2014). Global Biodiversity Finance: The Case for International Payments for Ecosystem Services. Medical Entomology and Zoology.6 indexed citations
Anstee, Stuart, et al.. (2011). Exploring ecosystem valuation to move towards net positive impact on biodiversity in the mining sector.14 indexed citations
6.
Bishop, Joshua. (2010). La economía de los ecosistemas y la biodiversidad. 90–97.2 indexed citations
7.
Sukhdev, Pavan, Heidi Wittmer, Christoph Schröter‐Schlaack, et al.. (2010). A economia dos ecossistemas e da biodiversidade: integrando a economia da natureza. Uma síntese da abordagem, conclusões e recomendações do TEEB.2 indexed citations
Bishop, Joshua, et al.. (2009). The financial costs of REDD: evidence from Brazil and Indonesia..59 indexed citations
10.
Bishop, Joshua, et al.. (2009). Building Biodiversity Business.45 indexed citations
11.
Bâ, Cheikh Tidiane, et al.. (2006). The economic value of wild resources in Senegal : a preliminary evaluation of non-timber forest products, game and freshwater fisheries. IUCN eBooks.13 indexed citations
12.
Bishop, Joshua, et al.. (2006). Estimating the value of ecotourism in the Djoudj National Bird Park in Senegal. IUCN eBooks.1 indexed citations
13.
Bishop, Joshua, et al.. (2006). Business and ecosystems : ecosystem challenges and business implications. IUCN eBooks.
14.
Bâ, Cheikh Tidiane, et al.. (2006). Evaluation économique des ressources sauvages au Sénégal : évaluation préliminaire des produits forestiers non ligneux, de la chasse et de la pêche continentale. IUCN eBooks.2 indexed citations
15.
Thomas, Lee, Peter Valentine, L. Emerton, & Joshua Bishop. (2006). Korunan Alanlarin Sürdürülebilir Finansmani: Güçlükler ve Seçenekler Üzerine Kapsamli Bir Degerlendirme. IUCN eBooks.2 indexed citations
16.
Kate, Kerry ten, Joshua Bishop, & Ricardo Bayón. (2004). Biodiversity offsets : views, experience, and the business case. IUCN eBooks.184 indexed citations
17.
Pagiola, Stefano, et al.. (2004). How much is an ecosystem worth? Assessing the economic value of conservation. World Bank eBooks.71 indexed citations
Nunan, Fiona, et al.. (1999). Valuing peri-urban natural resources: A guide for natural resource managers..1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.