Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
AVIO
2006305 citationsShan Lu, Joseph Tucek et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Tucek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Tucek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Tucek more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Tucek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Tucek. The network helps show where Joseph Tucek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph Tucek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph Tucek.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph Tucek based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph Tucek. Joseph Tucek is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kim, Mijung, Jun Li, Haris Volos, et al.. (2017). Sparkle. 656–656.11 indexed citations
Graefe, Goetz, Haris Volos, Hideaki Kimura, et al.. (2014). In-memory performance for big data. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. 8(1). 37–48.38 indexed citations
Anderson, Eric, Xiaozhou Li, Mehul A. Shah, Joseph Tucek, & Jay J. Wylie. (2010). What consistency does your key-value store actually provide?. 1–16.38 indexed citations
Yurcik, William, et al.. (2004). Who Moved My Data? A Backup Tracking System for Dynamic Workstation Environments. USENIX Large Installation Systems Administration Conference. 177–186.4 indexed citations
20.
Smart, William D., et al.. (2003). Lewis the Graduate Student: An Entry in the AAAI Robot Challenge.. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 46–51.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.